Jump to content

User talk:Millahnna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 142.163.146.217 (talk) at 21:07, 3 December 2010 (edit summary removed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If I've left a comment on your page I'm watching it. Please do likewise.  :)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

Your message

I've replied to your message on my user talk (in the next section). Thanks for your help, Millahnna. Tiderolls 13:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

Protect page

Would you protect Clash of the Titans (2010 film) page? --Gtabigfan2010 (talk) 01:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not an admin so I can't. I'll take a look and drop in a request if it needs it though. THanks for letting me know something was up. Millahnna (talk) 03:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poltergeist

Hi. Regarding your reversion, I agree that the reversion was valid, but as a friendly suggestion, saying "no thank you" in an edit summary may be perceived by the other editor as snarky or incivil, and therefore could be considered an inappropriate edit summary. It is best to cite the relevant policy (or principle of good writing) when providing your rationale in the edit summary, without comments that could lead to tension or bad feelings among those who may end up needing to collaborate on an given article. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah and thanks for the friendly reminder. I usually reserve that kind of snark for obvious vandalism but I was rolling ym eyes pretty hard and kind of lost my mind. Thanks homie. Millahnna (talk) 07:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inception/Heat plot revisions

Hello. I'm so new to wikipedia editing that I'm not very familiar with navigating the options for message sharing and the policies of article revisions. You were so helpful with advice for my revisions to the "Inception" plot summary that I've come to ask you to point me in the right direction for more help. I've touched up my original draft based on your notes and was wondering how I "justifiably" post my contribution to the main page. I don't want to become banned for not following the rules. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Also, I've added a condensed version of the plot summary for the film "Heat" which is waiting in "limbo" for the same consensus needed to post it on the main page. Question: can I post it to the main article if there is a note asking for help or must I wait for consensus? Does it normally take weeks (or months) to gain consensus? Again, any help pointing me in the right direction would be appreciated. I intend to start editing articles and because of my love of film and books, I've started with plot summary revisions. Also, how do I watch your page? KeithLD (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, one more thing while I have you... if I post my plot summary to the "Heat" film article, how do I remove the "this article needs help..." tag so that other readers won't think my contribution is the article that "needs help"? Thanks in advance for your help. KeithLD (talk) 10:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You'll see the plot tag right under the Plot heading when you go to edit the section. It'll look like this: {{plot|date=January 2010}} Sometimes there's no date parameter inside the bracket but it's still the same tag (a bot comes around and fills those in when we tag articles with stuff like that). Millahnna (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sissy Boy

Its not vandalism, its referenced, its a real thing which genuinely exists. Why do people keep marking it as vandalism? Please reply. The last guy doing it has refused to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.99.8 (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a redirect into an article with advert qualities for a non-notable business. Millahnna (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

just a lil heads up

You should know that User:PowerPuffGirlsBlossom is actually User:Kagome_85

same with the IP Address 142.162.192.210 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.146.217 (talk) 19:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also forgot to say I have a gut feeling User:VanityFaresssss is User:Kagome_85 also. I bet you it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.146.217 (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting....I think Kagome is before my time in terms of being really active but I've seen the name recently from someone else who suspected another sock was floating around. Hopefully one of my talk page stalkers will have a clue what to do with it because I'm out the door in 15 minutes. I don't know why the spaces thing in bulleted lists bugs me so much... it looks the same either way. I tend to find it easier to edit without them so I try to keep them out. But I guess it really doesn't matter. Thanks for the heads up. Millahnna (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your best bet in my opinion is to get a check user to look at those accounts and the IP address and if they check out and are User:Kagome_85 Then that user will be blocked for block evasion. 142.163.146.217 (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Millahnna&oldid=400374115"