Jump to content

Talk:Eyes of Laura Mars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.8.72.12 (talk) at 20:25, 26 December 2010 (→‎Boobs?: not a forum). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

So are her visions ever explained? Why was she able to see through the killer's eyes?

Seems like Strange Days took some ideas from this movie.

Correct title

The correct title of this article is The Eyes of Laura Mars. Dropping the article is discommended when it is part of a title: The Tempest. --Wetman (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was the title, too. I just ran the film, and the title of this film really is "Eyes of Laura Mars", without "The".
The book of photographs seen in the film is titled "The Eyes of Mars", which is probably the reason for the confusion. Kid Bugs (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Streisand visiting the set

In the second paragraph it says It was reported that Peters and Dunaway had a tense relationship while making the film, and that Streisand visited the set on a few occasions.

What has Peters and Dunaway having a tense relationship to do with Streisand visiting the set? Whay have they been put in the same sentance this (very bad) way? Unless there was something to it, that's not begin said here, then the fact that Streisand may have visited the set is not even worth mentioning. Dannman (talk) 15:44, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]