Talk:Ralph Cupper
Readding Ralph Cupper
Admin: Kim Dent-Brown said I could try to repost this with the added references. The topic now has one of the criteria from WP:MUSICBIO.
- I can't see any reference that shows any notability?TeapotgeorgeTalk 20:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- 2 of the references links you to a page where his CD's have been reviewed in 4-5 different newspapers. Is not being reviewed from many newspapers a sign of notability? Mpcpro (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- The references are not in English so it is difficult to tell, but they are also not the actual reviews just a list on a commercial site. I think it needs considerably more to show notabilityTeapotgeorgeTalk 21:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- The reviews are in paper form and has been written on the web on that page, which is the page of one of the musicians in the 2 CDs: Inge Haugen. From what I was told by Kim Dent-Brown not online sources are valid. Just saying it is hard to tell if its real or not should not be valid since there are many sources on wikipedia pages which are from non english sites. Also many use non online sources. If you want I can link you to an article which has been scanned in on paper which tells you a bit about the CD and the people behind it. Want me to link it? Mpcpro (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed the speedy delete for now but still feel that the references so far are NOT sufficient to confer notability.TeapotgeorgeTalk 21:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have any suggestions which would make it more notability? Mpcpro (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed the speedy delete for now but still feel that the references so far are NOT sufficient to confer notability.TeapotgeorgeTalk 21:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- The reviews are in paper form and has been written on the web on that page, which is the page of one of the musicians in the 2 CDs: Inge Haugen. From what I was told by Kim Dent-Brown not online sources are valid. Just saying it is hard to tell if its real or not should not be valid since there are many sources on wikipedia pages which are from non english sites. Also many use non online sources. If you want I can link you to an article which has been scanned in on paper which tells you a bit about the CD and the people behind it. Want me to link it? Mpcpro (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- The references are not in English so it is difficult to tell, but they are also not the actual reviews just a list on a commercial site. I think it needs considerably more to show notabilityTeapotgeorgeTalk 21:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)