Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 184.144.163.241 (talk) at 05:01, 4 January 2011 (→‎Template:PD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 4, 2011

Template:PD

Deprecated unused license template. Kelly hi! 03:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Post

This is the purported birth name of a living porn actress who performs under a stage name. WP:BLP says that a name that a person purposely obscures for reasons of privacy should not be included unless scrupulously sourced. Even then, the example there is directly on point with this case, and calls for additional editorial discretion. But here, there's no source and it's a BLP. The redirect has been around for years. It should be deleted as soon as practicable. David in DC (talk) 02:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPNAME:"When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context." David in DC (talk) 03:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feminist supremacy

These were created as redirects to an article that was eventually deleted through AfD. In the course of that discussion, the creator had Gynocracy, formerly a redirect to Matriarchy, speedied so that he could move his article there, but when the article was deleted, I re-created Gynocracy as the redirect it started as. Now these four pages are both double redirects and (in spite of the blue link) redirects to a non-existent article. I left Women's supremacy et al. because they're still plausible search terms for people looking for Matriarchy, but a) no one's going to be using these b) they are an inaccurate description of the content of the article they currently redirect to. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 00:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Myth of 1939—40

Delete the redirect which was created for no other purpose but to disparage one of POVs in a controversial article. Contrary to its creator's rationale, it is not an established term used in mainstream. Igny (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]