User talk:AndyTheGrump

This is AndyTheGrump's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives:

Sept 2010, Oct 2010, Nov 2010, Dec 2010.

Jan 2011, Feb 2011, Mar 2011.

Julian Assange

moved to Talk:Julian Assange#Lord Chief Justic electronic recording

Julian Assange two women accuser (names removed: AtG) conspiracy

hi,

This is a google translated page of two women intent to conpire.

http://www.samtycke.nu/2010/09/fallet-assange-uppgifter-raderas-om-och-om-igen/

One of the women who reported Julian Assange is (name removed: AtG). She stood for election to the City Council for the Social Democrats and is a public person to be examined. Therefore I publish her name.

....

please translate yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omega153 (talk • contribs) 03:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see a reason for removing the names. The names have been reported by hundreds of reliable sources.

Anyway, reading the sources some interesting connections came up. By the time Assange gets to Sweden hi will most likely be accused of satanic ritual abuse, including murdering small children (see Södertälje case).

The decision to exclude the alleged victims' names was arrived at by consensus, with regard to WP:BLP policy, particularly regarding the section on 'Presumption in favor of privacy'. As for Assange being accused of Satanic abuse, I dare say he may already have been somewhere, given the vitriol directed at him. Given that one contributor wished to insert claims that Assange was working for the CIA into the article, it wouldn't be any more bizarre. (Then again, half the 'contributors' to the article seem to think I'm working for the CIA. I'm not of course, I'm with the Illuminati). AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Just read your post at Wikipedia:ANI#Walled garden of hoaxes-in-waiting. Excellent work spotting that and bringing it to Elen's attention. More of that sort of thing in future please! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 08:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, though it was a cooperative effort, with Elen doing an exemplary job with the follow-up. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: Elen of the Roads

Hello, AndyTheGrump. You have new messages at Elen of the Roads's talk page.
Message added 03:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Spike Toronto 03:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of HIV-positive people

Could I invite you to revisit this debate and express an opinion on my argument there? It seems to be a relevant point that hadn't yet been raised and if you had a convincing rebuttal it would be likely to change my vote. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

don't remove accurate information and replace with wrong info

Check the ref. It is less than an hour old. Giffords can communicate. See CNN home page, top story. Hakkapeliitta (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you did was remove current information. You have a real difficulty with accuracy. Sorry. If you were more careful, you would have seen that it is the latest news Hakkapeliitta (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]