User talk:Istochleukzonnaam

JDL

Nowhere is it claimed it is written by the JDL. It just says it "is signed JDL". It is an illustration of the type of rethoric is used around the JDL. Your removal of this picture on Wikis around the world (some of which had been present for many months) can be considered an act of vandalism. Whaledad (talk) 16:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof this text was written by the JDL, or the JDL even had just something to dit with it. If it is not the work of the JDL it has nothing to do at the article of JDL. Everyone can write JDL on a wall with some racist texts above it. Probably the work of opponents of JDL. If you add it to the article like you want to do, the reader will see it as the work of the JDL. Which it most likely is not; i.e. there is no proof it is.

I can write some terrible racist stuff about black people on the wall and then sign it with "George W. Bush", make a pic of it and add it to the article about George W. Bush. That would, of course, not be accepted. Here happens the same. There is no proof at all that the JDL wrote this racist text, so one cannot link it to the JDL, neither in a quasi 'subtile' way. Istochleukzonnaam (talk) 16:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is signed JDL and that's what the caption says. You have been removing this picture on all Wikis around the world under the user names SwedischSven and Istochleukzonnaam. In Sweden you have already been blocked for this. Please stop your vandalism and sockpuppetery. Whaledad (talk) 17:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are not responding to my arguments. Istochleukzonnaam (talk) 18:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]