Jump to content

Talk:Inconsistent triad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eridax700 (talk | contribs) at 11:39, 26 February 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic

The last sentence stuck out to me as having the wrong tone for an encyclopedia article. I'm not here to defend any religion; it's just that the final comment represents the unsourced personal opinion of an editor, and needs to be removed. Jworldbook (talk) 06:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article really feels written from a biased (Christian) perspective and needs to be reworded. (Eridax700 (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Origin of example triad

The article should perhaps mention that J. L. Mackie's triad (concerning the problem of evil) goes back at least to Epicurus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.126.207.212 (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]