Jump to content

User talk:Gumr51/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Gumr51

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gumr51 (talk | contribs) at 19:36, 11 March 2011 (→‎Lack of cohesion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page is intended for preliminary community review of articles, before uploading to Wikipedia.

OK I made changes here Sandbox The link you gave me, by the way, is for an entirely new account, not a sandbox. My link is your sandbox. Anyway, you are going to notice that I took a LOT of information out and I only worked on the first section and started on another. I took out what looks to be a new start of an article for Chalatzingo in the header. For the background, I took out information I could not directly relate somehow to Las Bocas. If Las Bocas is not in the Valley of Tehuacán, that needs to come out also. As for Caballo Pintado, I do not understand what you wrote (and noted it on the page). Are they two names for the same site (which is what I thought initially, or are they separate sites? If its the latter, Caballo Pintado cannot be described in this article, only that another archeologist was doing work nearby.Thelmadatter (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I now realize it is a new account, will probably erase it later. The article looks good, but you did not comment on whether or not you see plagiarism. I concur on removing the part on Chalcatzingo, the background information is intended to be "regional background" and not just site background, hence the reference to Valle de Tehuacan is regional not site, and Las Bocas is not in this valley. Caballo Pintado is another name for the same site. I will do some more modifications and add some notes from the links you gave me. If you do not mind, I will copy and paste this exchange on the article talk page for the reference of others. Gracias--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, Added some new notes from the link you provided (14), and replaced back some of the regional background. we could remove it altogether or cut it down some. It is inetended to give an idea the age of cultures in the state.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 20:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

In relation to the need for details on where the information was found, please note the following:

The enciclopedia link, the problem is that no matter where on the page you go, it maintains the same www link, it does not change. The info was sourced first from the colum in the left, click on history. Then at the bottom, of the same left column, click on Municipios, then find the Xochiltecpec and Izucar de Matamoros links. You will notice that the address does not change.

On the FAMSI report, at the bottom of the poage, there is an icon "next page", click there and takes you to the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gumr51 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of cohesion

The text is not the draft I placed there, it was lost on the other page. I would like to suggest that, based on both your comments, I go, redo the draft, place it there again and we start fresh. Will see how I can make better references to links. --Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gumr51/sandbox&oldid=418341765"