Jump to content

User talk:70.50.53.43

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.49.242.106 (talk) at 23:29, 11 March 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please stop accusing User:Vjasper of vandalism. In addition, your unexplained deletion of content from the article Sabre (fencing) could be construed as vandalism. See WP:POINT. If you have issues, please post to the talk page of the article in question. Thank you. Isopropyl 18:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop giving people useless advice. The next time something enters your mind, think before you speak (or write). I removed a totally unnecessary, irrelevant link. Do not ever try to tell me what to do again. You are my inferior, and it is beneath me to respond to your comments.
Please stop reverting this edit without discussion. Perhaps you are unaware of the three revert rule but if you continue, you may be banned for violating it. A list of American fencers is clearly relevant to this article. If you think that others should be linked feel free to write such articles. Perhaps List of sabre fencers. Discussion is always called for when you come into disagreement over article contents; however, name-calling and belittling as above is neither useful nor acceptable. See WP:CIVIL. Rmhermen 20:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A list of American sabre fencers clearly is *not* relevant to the article. Read it and see for yourself.

S.V. Shereshevskii

Please stop removing the reference here. This is not a "suggested reading" or "external link." This is claimed as a source that was drawn on in writing or confirming the article. Rmhermen 15:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you stop and think, please? (And maybe stop blindly reverting every edit I make. You've obviously got too much time on your hands.) This book is one of about ten million cheesy books on memory that make reference to S. It is *not* cited in the body of the article, and therefore should *not* be listed. Please think next time, before you act. Please! You just make yourself look bad. 70.49.242.106 23:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]