Talk:Xserve
Apple Inc. Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Errors
The xserver clusternode has dual gigabit ethernet ports. A server shipping _without_ ethernet port would be pretty crazy, even for Apple.
Needed Section
It seems as if this article could use a section on "Criticism" or "Reception" of Macintosh's Xserve servers. 24.175.54.43 05:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
---Agreed, says I! User: Coyotejack 21:04, 13 July 2006
Could someone mention the operating systems currently supported on this boxes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.247.147.124 (talk • contribs) 08:09, August 24, 2007
Name
Is the Xserve actually officially referred to as a "Macintosh" anywhere? Is there some official Wikipedia convention that makes it one regardless of that? I vaguely remember reading some years ago about about how Apple were trying to phase out the Macintosh name, or at least replace it with "Mac". --68.44.13.236 21:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting question... now that you mention it, I've never heard the term "Macintosh" or "Mac" used in reference to the XServe. Maury 23:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Apple no longer sells a "Macintosh". everything is either MacSomething or just a name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petchboo (talk • contribs) 20:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Link to UATA
The link to UATA, near "Up to 4 UATA/100 hard disk drives", leads to a page that does not contain UATA. --Mortense (talk) 08:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Intel Xserve image
The image being used under the Intel Xserve section is the same as the G5 Xserve, as I had noted when reading that the Intel one had a USB port on front instead of FireWire in the PowerPC models. Should the image be replaced? ChrstphrChvz (talk • contribs) 04:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think it should be fine. Not all Intel Xserves have USB ports on the front. I have 2 at work that have firewire 400 ports and look identical to the G5 sitting above them. Skootles (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)