Jump to content

Talk:Enumerative definition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 129.177.155.226 (talk) at 17:37, 11 July 2011 (→‎Are enumerative definitions necessarily extensional?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic / Language Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of language

Notes & Queries

Jon Awbrey 17:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are enumerative definitions necessarily extensional?

Intuitively, it seems natural to use the expression "enumerative definition" about both enumerations of objects and of types of objects. What makes a definition enumerative is, in my opinion, that it gives a disjunction of sufficient criteria. If you define "farm animal" as "horse, sheep, pig, chicken etc." we would have an enumerative definition, but not an extensional.