Jump to content

Talk:SP-350 Denise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 130.83.117.163 (talk) at 12:16, 21 July 2011 (→‎What has SP 350 to do with SP 300?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconShips Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Assessment

This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. HausTalk 22:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


questions on this article

"Despite having positive buoyancy, the SP350 is weighted to negative buoyancy with ballast weights that can be jettisoned in an emergency. " Despite is not the correct word to be used. It would be better if the sentence read " Because it is naturally positively buoyant, the SP350 is weighted......

"If the craft is within 100 meters of the surface, the crew can abandon it via the top hatch, provided they are equipped with emergency breathing apparatus."

I am not aware of any emergency breathing apparatus that can be used at 330 feet. The complications of managing the partial pressure of O2 would be too difficult. Does anyone know of an emergency breathing apparatus that can operate at 330 feet? Throckmorton Guildersleeve (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What has SP 350 to do with SP 300?

I have read, that after a reinforcement the SP 300 just was renamed SP 350. Is it true? If it is so, it should be mentioned in the article. ----130.83.117.163 (talk) 12:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]