Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackjit

Jackjit

Jackjit (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackjit/Archive.

Suspected sockpuppets

Validtimesnz (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

July 2011 - Jackjit evading his block and editing again using his dynamic 118 IP

Jackjit is editing/vandalizing "conservative/Republican" articles again using his dynamic/revolving 118 IP again (add 118.93.244.193 and 118.92.42.162 to the long list). I also strongly believe he is using the sockpuppet Thrallomind based upon the slanderous type/style of edits about BLP Mitch McConnell and also 118 IP shows up vandalizing article right after sockpuppet Thrallomind appears. This all fits Jackjit's pathetic history and MO exactly. --RedEyedCajun (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user Thrallomind needs permanent block even if it's not Jackjit, which I believe it is: made the following vandalismhere on the Mitch McConnell article recently: "Is a know child molester and Nazi. He is a member of the KKK and has paid militant groups to kill President Obama. He spent time with Osama Bin Ladden during the summer 0f 2001 and paid for 18 airplane tickets. Like all modern Republicans he seeks the death of all non-white Christians."

and here again: "Raped a 12 year old boy and paid hush money to the family. But he stole most of this from poor old women under threat of force. Grand Wizard in the KKK Nazi sympathizer It is well know that he is a Homosexual and hires only young men for his staff. He would rather sink the U.S. economy then be nice to a black person." --RedEyedCajun (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011 - Jackjit now shopping around to get the edits he wants

He's shopping around WP:FORUMSHOP for help to make his wanted edits (and is succeeding using lies and deception), just as his long history shows he has done in his past when he can't get his way on Republican/conservative articles. Please look at his recent unfair mischief here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Red_Eye_w.2F_Greg_Gutfeld -~~using his revolving/shared 118IP adress~~ - 118.93.220.21

He has apparently changed to a new Internet Service Provider after his most recent block on his dynamic 118 IP and is now using the static IP 118.93.220.21 and is again making the exact same kind of vandalism and edits. --RedEyedCajun (talk) 14:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is discouraging to me as I have done my very best to follow Wiki policy to improve this place called Wiki. --RedEyedCajun (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The account has been blocked as Jackjits. By the way posting something at the Neutral point of view noticeboard is not shopping around. I read through that conversation and nothing ontoward has occurred there from any of the other editors. AIRcorn (talk) 02:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When the banned user Jackjit couldn't get "his way" on the article ("his way" was reverted by about 5 editors over 2 month period) then goes shopping around WP:FORUMSHOP to find a proxy to make "his edits" by directly asking for help, Jackjit/118IP quote "...if someone could please make these changes as the current author to the page keeps changing these attempts", then yes, I consider that a textbook case of shopping around for help. Also, he lied when he did not disclose he was a banned editor and when he said it was "one author". Those 5 editors never had a chance to give their opinion or join the discussion on the NPOV noticeboard. Where's the Wiki fairness in that mischief? The NPOV noticeboard rules clearly state "if you want to discuss changes to content of an article, then have that discussion on the article's talk page." With that said, thanks for the block - again. --RedEyedCajun (talk) 02:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

25 July 2011

Callumshort posted the following here on Tim Pawlenty with similar BLP violating edits as Jackjit, then 9 hrs later Validtimesnz restored same edit. In between these two edits, IP 125.236.54.18 restored same edit. This 125 IPs 'contributions list' has made similar BLP edits as Jackjit/118IP history shows on Eric Cantor, Tim Pewlenty and Marco Rubio. Also, an IP address check shows this 125 IP is in Auckland, New Zealand, same town/country as the confirmed Jackjit IP 118.93.220.21, which was positively identified recently as Jackjit by me and administrator Gadfium, who blocked it (see above Jackjit/118 Forum Shopping). This new 125 IP may be a dynamic address, because I see Gadfium has reverted similar BLP edits on Simon Power by IP 125.239.73.180 and IP 125.239.113.213 --RedEyedCajun (talk) 07:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

30 July 2011

Validtimesnz making similar BLP violating edits at Simon Power, and IP 118.92.68.85 restoring them. 118.92.42.162 has also restored material at Marco Rubio originating with Jackjit.-gadfium 08:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 August 2011

Cmseaman posted the following here on Mitch McConnell article without any source right after Jackjit vandalized the article many times using his dynamic 118-IP address: --RedEyedCajun (talk) 12:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]