Jump to content

Manchester Ship Canal

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs) at 19:55, 8 August 2011 (Operational history: fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Manchester Ship Canal
Map
Specifications
Locks5
StatusOpen
History
Principal engineerThomas Walker
Date of act5 August 1885
Date of first use1 January 1894

The Manchester Ship Canal is a 36-mile-long (58 km) river navigation in North West England. Designed to give the city of Manchester direct access to the sea, it was built between 1887 and 1894 at a cost of about £15 million, and in its day was the largest river navigation canal in the world.

The canal generally follows the original route of the rivers Mersey and Irwell, and along its course uses several sets of locks. Major landmarks along its route include the Barton Swing Aqueduct, the first swing aqueduct in the world, and Trafford Park, the world's first planned industrial estate and still the largest in Europe. The Manchester Ship Canal Company built and operated a railway to transport goods to and from the docks alongside the canal.

The Manchester Ship Canal enabled the Port of Manchester to become Britain's third busiest port, despite its being about 40 miles (64 km) inland. Although able to accommodate a range of vessels, from coastal ships to inter-continental cargo liners, the canal is not large enough for all modern vessels. As of 2011, the canal traffic had decreased from its peak in 1958 of 18 million long tons (20 million short tons) of freight each year, to about 7 million long tons (7.8 million short tons). The canal is now privately owned by Peel Ports, whose plans include redevelopment, expansion, and an increase in shipping from 8000 containers a year to 100,000 by 2030, as part of their Atlantic Gateway project.

History

Early history

The idea that the rivers Mersey and Irwell should be made navigable from the Mersey Estuary in the west to Manchester in the east was first proposed in 1660, and revived in 1712 by Thomas Steers.[1] In 1720 the necessary legislation was proposed and the Act of Parliament[2] for the navigation was passed into law in 1721,[3][4] following which construction work was undertaken by the Mersey & Irwell Navigation Company.[1] Work began in 1724, and by 1734 boats "of moderate size" could make the journey from quays near Water Street in Manchester, to the Irish Sea.[5] The navigation was suitable only for small ships, and during periods of low rainfall or when strong easterly winds held back the tide in the estuary, there was not always sufficient depth of water for a fully laden boat.[6] The completion in 1776 of the Bridgewater Canal, followed in 1830 by the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, intensified competition for the carriage of goods. In 1825 an application had been made to Parliament for an Act to allow the construction of a ship canal between the mouth of the River Dee and Manchester at a cost of £1 million, but "the necessary forms not having been observed", it did not become law.[7] In 1844 ownership of the Mersey & Irwell Navigation was transferred to the Bridgewater Trustees, and in 1872 it was sold to The Bridgewater Navigation Company for £1.112 million.[8] The navigation had by then fallen into disrepair; in 1882 it was described as being "hopelessly choked with silt and filth",[8] and was closed to all but the smaller boats for 264 out of 311 working days.[8]

Refer to caption
A cartoon published in the satirical magazine Punch in 1882, ridiculing the idea that Manchester could become a major seaport

Along with deteriorating economic conditions in the 1870s,[9] the dues charged by the Port of Liverpool and the railway charges from there to Manchester were perceived to be excessive by Manchester's business community; it was often cheaper to import goods from Hull than it was from Liverpool.[10] A ship canal was proposed as a way to reduce carriage charges, avoid payment of dock and town dues at Liverpool, and by-pass the three Liverpool to Manchester railways by giving Manchester direct access to the sea for its imports and its exports of manufactured goods.[11] Historians such as Ian Harford have suggested that the canal may also have been conceived as an "imaginative response to [the] problems of depression and unemployment" that Manchester was experiencing during the early 1880s.[12]

The idea of a ship canal was championed by Manchester manufacturer Daniel Adamson, who arranged a meeting at his home in Didsbury on 27 June 1882. He invited the representatives of several Lancashire towns, local businessmen and politicians, and two civil engineers: Hamilton Fulton and Edward Leader Williams. Fulton proposed a tidal canal, with no locks and a deepened channel into Manchester; Williams was in favour of a series of locks. Both engineers were invited to submit their proposals, and Williams' plans were selected to form the basis of a Bill submitted to Parliament in November 1882.[13] The Bill attracted fierce opposition from the city of Liverpool and several railway companies, and the passage of the necessary enabling Act of Parliament was delayed until 6 August 1885. Certain conditions were attached; £5 million had to be raised, and the ship canal company was legally obliged to buy both the Bridgewater Canal and the Mersey & Irwell Navigation within two years.[14] The estimated cost of construction was £5.16 million, and the work was expected to take four years to complete.[13]

Financing

refer to caption
Cheque dated 3 August 1887, in the amount of £1,710,000, for the purchase of the Bridgewater Navigation Company. At the time it was the largest cheque ever presented.[15]

The enabling Act of Parliament stipulated that the ship canal company's entire share capital of £8 million had to be issued within two years, otherwise the Act would lapse.[16] Adamson wanted to encourage the widest possible share ownership, and he believed that the funds should be raised largely from the working population. Richard Peacock, the vice-chairman of the Provisional Manchester Ship Canal Committee, had said in 1882:

No few individuals should be expected to subscribe and form a company for mere gain; it should be taken on by the public; and if it is not ... I for one should say drop the scheme ... unless I see the public coming forward in a hearty manner.[17]

The enabling Act did not allow the company to issue shares of less value than £10 and so, to make them easier for ordinary people to buy, shilling coupons were issued in books of ten so that the shares could be paid for in instalments.[18] By May 1887 only £3 million had been raised. The contractor chosen to construct the canal, Thomas Walker, agreed to accept £500,000 of the contract price in shares, but raising the remainder required another Act of Parliament to allow the company's share capital to be restructured as £3 million of ordinary shares and £4 million of preference shares.[16] Adamson remained convinced that the money should be raised from ordinary members of the public, and he opposed the capital restructuring, resigning as chairman of the Ship Canal Committee on 1 February 1887. A prospectus for the sale of the preference shares was issued jointly by Barings and Rothschild on 15 July, and by 21 July the issue had been fully underwritten.[19] Construction of the canal began on 11 November 1887, when Lord Egerton of Tatton, who had taken over the chairmanship of the Manchester Ship Canal Company from Adamson, cut the first sod.[20]

The canal company exhausted its capital of £8 million in 4 years, although only half the construction work had been completed.[21] To avoid bankruptcy the company appealed for funds to Manchester Corporation, which set up a Ship Canal Committee. On 9 March 1891 the corporation decided, on the committee's recommendation, to lend the necessary £3 million, to preserve the city's prestige. In return the corporation was allowed to appoint five of the fifteen members of the board of directors.[21] The company subsequently raised its estimates of the cost of completion in September 1891 and again in June 1892. An executive committee was appointed as an emergency measure in December 1891, and on 14 October 1892 the Ship Canal Committee resolved to lend a further £1.5 million on condition that Manchester Corporation had an absolute majority on the canal company's board of directors and its various sub-committees.[21] The corporation subsequently appointed 11 of the 21 seats,[22] nominated Alderman Sir John Harwood as deputy director of the company, and secured majorities on five of the board's six sub-committees. The cost to Manchester Corporation of financing the Ship Canal Company had a significant impact on local taxpayers. Manchester's municipal debt rose by 67 percent, resulting in a 26 percent increase in rates between 1892 and 1895.[23]

Construction

The ship canal alongside the Mersey between Stanlow and Runcorn, looking east

Thomas Walker was appointed as the contractor for the construction of the canal, and the work was overseen by the chief engineer and designer Edward Leader Williams. The canal's 36-mile (58 km) length was divided into eight sections, with an engineer responsible for each. The first section was from Eastham to Ellesmere Port. Mount Manisty, a huge mound of earth northwest of Ellesmere Port on a narrow stretch of land between the canal and the Mersey, was created from the soil extracted by the excavations in that area. It and the adjacent Manisty Cutting were named after the engineer in charge of that section. The last section to be built was from Weston Point through the Runcorn gap to Norton, as the existing docks at Runcorn and Weston had to be kept operational until they could be connected to the completed western sections of the ship canal.[24]

For the first two years construction went according to plan, but on 25 November 1889 Walker died. Initially the work was continued by his executors, but the project began to suffer a number of setbacks, not helped by severe weather and several serious floods. In January 1891, when the work ought to have been completed, a severe winter added to the difficulties when the Bridgewater Canal, the canal company's only source of income, was closed by ice. The company decided to take over the contracting work, and bought all the equipment on site for £400,000.[25]

An 1891 painting by Benjamin Williams Leader depicting the construction of Eastham Docks

The ship canal was completely filled with water in November 1893, and the Manchester Ship Canal Police were formed the following month.[26] It opened to its first traffic on 1 January 1894. On 21 May that year Queen Victoria performed the official opening, the last of three royal visits she made to Manchester. During the ceremony she knighted the Mayor of Salford, William Henry Bailey, and the Lord Mayor of Manchester, Anthony Marshall; Edward Leader Williams was knighted on 2 July by letters patent.[27]

The ship canal had taken six years to complete at a cost of just over £15 million,[28] equivalent to about £1.64 billion as of 2010.[nb 1] It was the longest river navigation canal in the world,[30] and remains the world's eighth-longest ship canal, only slightly shorter than the Panama Canal in Central America.[31] More than 54 million cubic yards (41,000,000 m³) of material were excavated, about half as much as was removed in the building of the Suez Canal.[32] An average of 12,000 workers were employed during construction, peaking at 17,000.[33] Regular navvies were paid at a rate of 4+12d per hour for a 10-hour working day, equivalent to about £16 per day as of 2010.[34][nb 2][35] In terms of machinery, the scheme called upon over 200 miles (320 km) of temporary rail track, 180 locomotives, more than 6000 trucks and wagons, 124 steam-powered cranes, 192 other steam engines, and 97 steam excavators.[36][37] Major engineering landmarks of the scheme included the Barton Swing Aqueduct, the first swing aqueduct in the world,[38] and a neighbouring swing bridge for road traffic at Barton, both of which are now Grade II* listed structures.[39]

In 1909 the depth of the canal was increased by 2 feet (0.61 m) to 28 feet (8.5 m), matching that of the Suez Canal.[40]

Operational history

A cargo ship heading west out of Irlam locks towards the Mersey and the Irish Sea

The Manchester Ship Canal enabled the Port of Manchester to become Britain's third busiest port, despite its being about 40 miles (64 km) inland.[31] Since its opening in 1894 the canal has handled a wide range of ships and cargos, from coastal vessels to intra-European shipping and inter-continental cargo liners. The first vessel to unload its cargo on the opening day was the Pioneer, belonging to the Co-operative Wholesale Society (CWS), which was also the first vessel registered at Manchester; the CWS operated a weekly service to Rouen.[41] Although some other shipowners brought their vessels to Manchester, it was Manchester Liners who established regular sailings by large ocean-going vessels. In late 1898 the Manchester City, at 7,698 gross tons, became the largest vessel to reach the terminal docks. Carrying cattle and general cargo, it was met by the Lord Mayor of Manchester and a large welcoming crowd.[42]

In 1968 Manchester Liners decided to switch its fleet to container vessels only, to service which it built two dedicated container terminals next to No. 9 Dock.[43] The four container vessels commissioned that year, each of 11,898 gross tons, were the largest ever to make regular use of the terminal docks at Salford.[44] In 1974 the canal handled 2.9 million long tons (3.25 million short tons) of dry cargo, 27 percent of which was carried by Manchester Liners.[45] The dry tonnage was, and is still, greatly supplemented by crude and refined oil products transported in large tanker ships to and from the Queen Elizabeth II Dock at Eastham and the Stanlow Refinery just east of Ellesmere Port, and also in smaller tankers to Runcorn. The limitations imposed by the canal on the maximum size of container vessel meant that by the mid-1970s Manchester Liners was becoming uncompetitive; the company sold its last remaining ship in 1985.[46]

Tonnage Handled by the Manchester Ship Canal Ports[47][nb 3]
1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945
1,358,875 3,060,516 5,434,046 5,881,691 6,135,003 6,531,963
1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
18,563,376 15,715,409 14,816,121 9,767,380 8,751,938 7,261,919

The Manchester Ship Canal was never the commercial success its sponsors had hoped for. Many ship owners were reluctant to dispatch ocean-going vessels along a "locked cul-de-sac" at a maximum speed of 6 knots (11 km/h; 6.9 mph). The canal's difficulty in attracting a diversified export trade meant that ships not uncommonly had to return down the canal loaded with ballast rather than freight. The only staple imports attracted to the Port of Manchester were lamp oil and bananas, the latter from 1902 until 1911. Further, as the import trade in oil began to grow during the 20th century the balance of canal traffic switched to the west, from Salford to Stanlow, eventually culminating in the closure of the docks at Salford. Historian Thomas Stuart Willan has observed that "What may seem to require explanation is not the comparative failure of the Ship Canal but the unquenchable vitality of the myth of its success".[48]

Route

Manchester Ship Canal
Mersey estuary
Eastham Locks
Weaver Sluices
Weston Marsh Lock Weaver Navigation
Weston Mersey Side Lock (closed)
Bridgewater Side Lock (closed)
Runcorn Docks
Bridgewater Canal junction (blocked)
Runcorn Railway Bridge
Silver Jubilee Bridge
Old Quay Side Lock (closed)
Old Quay Bridge
 A533  Mersey Gateway
Moore Lane Swing Bridge
Acton Grange Railway Viaduct
 A5060  Chester Road Swing Bridge
Walton Lock (closed)
 A49  London Road Swing Bridge
Howley Weir
Cantilever High Level Bridge
 A50  Knutsford Road Swing Bridge
Latchford Railway Viaduct
Latchford Locks
Woolston Siphon Weir
Woolston Guard Weir
 M6  Thelwall Viaduct
River Mersey leaves canal route
 B5159  Warburton Bridge
Cadishead Railway Viaduct (disused)
Irlam Container Terminal
River Mersey joins canal route
Liverpool–Manchester lines
Irlam Locks
Barton Locks
 M60  Barton High Level bridge
Barton Low Level bridge
Thirlmere Aqueduct (buried pipeline)
Barton Swing Bridge
Barton Swing Aqueduct
 A576  Centenary Lift Bridge
Mode Wheel Locks
Media City Footbridge
Millennium Bridge
Salford Quays
Railway swing bridge (moved to Salford Quays)
Trafford Road Swing Bridge
 A5063  Trafford Road
Manchester Metrolink
Pomona Docks
Bridgewater Canal
Woden Street Bridge, Salford
Junction of canal and River Irwell

Geography

From Eastham the canal runs parallel to, and along the south side of the River Mersey, past Ellesmere Port. Between Rixton, east of the M6 motorway's Thelwall Viaduct and Irlam, the canal joins the Mersey; between Irlam and Salford it uses the course of the River Irwell.[49]

Locks

Vessels travelling to and from the terminal docks, which are 60 feet (18 m) above sea level, must pass through several locks. Each set has a large lock for ocean-going ships and a smaller, narrower lock for vessels such as tugs and coasters.[50] The entrance locks at Eastham on the Wirral side of the Mersey, which seal off the tidal estuary, are the largest on the canal. The larger lock is 600 feet (180 m) long by 80 feet (24 m) wide; the smaller lock is 350 feet (110 m) by 50 feet (15 m). Four additional sets of locks further inland, 600 feet (180 m) long and 65 feet (20 m) wide and (350 feet (110 m) by 45 feet (14 m) for the smaller lock),[51] each have a rise of approximately 15 feet (4.6 m).[50] The locks are at Eastham; Latchford, near Warrington; Irlam; Barton near Eccles and Mode Wheel, Salford.[50]

Docks and wharfs

Seven terminal docks were constructed for the opening of the canal. Four small docks were located on the south side of the canal near Cornbrook, within the Borough of Stretford, and named Pomona Docks No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4. The three main docks were located within Salford and were built primarily for large ocean-going vessels. These were situated to the west of Trafford Road on the north bank of the canal and were named No. 6, No. 7, and No. 8. In 1905, No. 9 Dock was completed on the same site.[52] Dock No. 5, known as Ordsall Dock, was part of Pomona Docks, but was dug on the Salford side of the river; it was never completed and was filled in around 1905.[53]

Pomona Docks have also been filled in, and remain largely derelict except for the still intact No. 3 Dock, which has a lock connecting it to the nearby Bridgewater Canal at the point where the two canals run in parallel. The western four docks have been converted into the Salford Quays development; ships using the Manchester Ship Canal now dock at various places along the canal side such as Mode Wheel (Salford), Trafford Park, and Ellesmere Port.[54] Most ships have to terminate at Salford Quays, although smaller vessels can continue up the River Irwell to Hunts Bank, near Manchester Cathedral.[55]

In 1893 the Ship Canal Company sold a parcel of land just east of the Mode Wheel Locks to the newly established Manchester Dry Docks Company. The graving docks were constructed adjacent to the south bank of the canal, and a floating pontoon dock was built nearby.[56] Each of the three graving docks could accommodate ocean-going ships of up to 535 feet (163.1 m) in length and 64 feet (19.5 m) in beam,[57] equivalent to vessels of 8,000 gross tons. Manchester Liners acquired control of the company in 1974, to ensure the availability of facilities for the repair of its fleet of ships.[58]

Trafford Park

Two years after the opening of the ship canal financier Ernest Terah Hooley bought the 1,183-acre (4,790,000 m2)[59] country estate belonging to Sir Humphrey Francis de Trafford for £360,000 (£52.6 million as of 2024).[nb 4][35]}}</ref>[60] Close to Manchester and at the end of the canal, Hooley intended to develop the site as an exclusive housing estate, screened by woods from industrial units[61] constructed along the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) frontage onto the canal.[62]

With the predicted traffic for the canal slow to materialise, Hooley and Marshall Stevens (the general manager of the Ship Canal Company) came to see the benefits that the industrial development of Trafford Park could offer to both the ship canal and the estate. In January 1897 Stevens became the managing director of Trafford Park Estates,[61] where he remained until 1930, latterly as its joint chairman and managing director.[63]

Within five years Trafford Park, Europe's largest industrial estate, was home to forty firms. The earliest structures on the canal side were grain silos, the grain used for flour and as ballast for ships carrying raw cotton. The wooden silo built opposite No.9 Dock in 1898 (destroyed by enemy action in 1940) was Europe's largest grain elevator. The CWS bought land on Trafford Wharf in 1903, where it opened a bacon factory and a flour mill. In 1906 it bought the Sun Mill, which it extended in 1913 to create the UK's largest flour mill, with its own wharf, elevators and silos.[64]

Inland from the canal The British Westinghouse Electric Company bought 11 percent of the estate. Westinghouse's American architect Charles Heathcote was responsible for much of the planning and design of their factory, which built steam turbines and turbo generators. By 1899 Heathcote had also designed fifteen warehouses for the Manchester Ship Canal Company.[64]

Other features on the banks

In 1984 Salford City Council used a derelict land grant to purchase the docks at Salford from the Ship Canal Company,[65] rebranding the area as Salford Quays. Principle developers Urban Waterside began redevelopment work the following year.[66]

At Ellesmere Port the canal is joined by the Shropshire Union Canal, at a site now occupied by the National Waterways Museum. The area formerly consisted of a 7-acre (2.8 ha) canal port linking the Shropshire Union Canal to the River Mersey. Designed by Thomas Telford, it remained operational until the 1950s. It was a "marvellously self-contained world" with locks, docks, warehouses, a blacksmith's forge, stables, and cottages for the workers.[67] Its Island Warehouse was built in 1871 to store grain.[68] A few miles from Ellesmere Port, at Weston, near Runcorn, the ship canal also connects with the Weaver Navigation.[69]

Manchester Ship Canal Railway

A preserved Manchester Ship Canal 0-6-0T locomotive, now on display at The Engine House in Highley[70]

The standard gauge Manchester Ship Canal Railway was built to service freight to and from the canal's docks, between nearby industrial estates such as Trafford Park, and connected to the various railway companies with track near the canal. Unlike most other railway companies in the UK it was not nationalised in 1948, and grew to become the largest private railway system in the country; at its peak it had 790  employees,[71] 75 locomotives, 2,700 wagons and more than 200 miles (320 km) of track.[72]

The MSC Railway was able to receive and despatch goods trains to and from all the UK's main line railway systems, using connecting junctions at three points in the terminal docks. Two were to the north of the canal, operated by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway and the London and North Western Railway, and one was to the south, operated by the Cheshire Lines Committee.[71]

Many of the MSC's steam locomotives were 0-6-0 tank engines, several of which have been preserved, including Hudswell Clarke 0-6-0T no. 32 Gothenburg.[73] They were designed to enable them to negotiate the tight-radius curves of the tracks in the estate; the middle wheels of the 0-6-0 arrangement were flangeless, and the coupling rods had a hinged central section that permitted several inches of lateral play. A fleet of diesel locomotives was purchased between 1959 and 1966, but it was eventually run down and the remaining engines stationed at Ellesmere Port and Stanlow.[74]

Present day

The passenger ferry Snowdrop at Irlam Locks
Allied Mills Coronet Mill at Centenary park

Unlike most other British canals, the Manchester Ship Canal was never nationalised. The amount of freight carried by the canal peaked in 1958 at 18 million long tons (20 million short tons), but the increasing size of ocean-going ships and the port's failure to introduce modern freight-handling methods resulted in that headline figure dropping steadily, and the closure of the docks in Salford in 1984.[75] Total freight movements on the ship canal were down to 7.56 million long tons (8.47 short tons) by 2000, and further reduced to 6.60 million long tons (7.39 short tons) for the year ending September 2009.[76]

The maximum length of vessel accepted is 530 feet (161.5 m) with a beam of 63.5 feet (19.35 m)[77] and a maximum draft of 24 feet (7.3 m).[44] By contrast the similarly sized Panama Canal, completed a few years after the Manchester Ship Canal, is able to accept ships of up to 950 feet (289.6 m) in length with a beam of 106 feet (32.31 m).[78] Ships passing under the Runcorn Bridge have a height restriction of 70 feet (21 m) above normal water levels.[79]

Manchester City Council[nb 5] retained its seats on the board of the Ship Canal Company until the mid-1980s. By then the arrangement had become "meaningless", as most of the company's shares were controlled by the property developer John Whittaker. In 1986 the council agreed to give up all but one of its seats in return for a payment of £10 million. The arrangement extricated Manchester Council from a politically difficult conflict of interest, as Whittaker was proposing to develop a large out of town shopping centre on land owned by the Ship Canal Company at Dumplington, the present-day Trafford Centre. The council opposed the scheme, believing that it would impact negatively on the city centre economy, but accepted that it was "obviously in the interests of the shareholders".[81][nb 6]

On 18 October 2007 the retail chain Tesco announced that it had begun using the canal to transport New World wine between Liverpool and the Irlam Container Terminal, from where the cargo is offloaded and transported to a nearby bottling plant. Tesco claims it will save 700,000 miles (1.13 million km) of road haulage per year.[83]

In 1991 the Ship Canal Company was acquired by Peel Holdings; as of 2011 it is owned and operated by Peel Ports, which also owns the Port of Liverpool.[84] In 2011 the company announced a £50 billion Atlantic Gateway plan to develop the Port of Liverpool and the Manchester Ship Canal as a way of combating increasing road congestion. The scheme involves the construction of a large distribution centre to be named Port Salford and the addition of six sites along the canal for the loading and unloading of freight. Peel Ports predict that the number of containers transported along the canal could increase from the 8000 carried in 2010 to 100,000 by 2030.[85]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ The method of calculation used is the GDP deflator, the ratio of nominal to real gross domestic product multiplied by 100.[29]
  2. ^ Comparing relative purchasing power of 3 shillings and 9 pence in 1894 with 2010.
  3. ^ All quantities are given in metric tonnes.
  4. ^ Comparing relative purchasing power of £360,000 in 1896 with 2010.
  5. ^ Manchester Corporation was subsumed into the newly created Greater Manchester County Council in 1974 until 1986, when the unitary authority of Manchester City Council was established.[80]
  6. ^ £7 million was paid in cash and £3 million invested in a joint venture company set up by Whittaker and the council, Ship Canal Developments. The object of the new company was to provide resources and development expertise for the regeneration of east Manchester.[82]
Footnotes
  1. ^ a b Gray 1997, p. 5
  2. ^ 7 Geo. I c.15
  3. ^ Albert 2007, p. 200
  4. ^ Owen 1983, p. 10
  5. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 3–4
  6. ^ Owen 1983, p. 7
  7. ^ Wheeler 1836, p. 279
  8. ^ a b c Owen 1983, p. 16
  9. ^ Harford 1994, p. 41
  10. ^ Owen 1983, p. 27.
  11. ^ Willan 1977, p. 173
  12. ^ Harford 1994, p. 168
  13. ^ a b Owen 1983, p. 31
  14. ^ Owen 1983, p. 37
  15. ^ Owen 1983, p. 43
  16. ^ a b Harford 1994, p. 14
  17. ^ Harford 1994, p. 132
  18. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 38–39
  19. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 42–43
  20. ^ Farnie 1980, p. 4
  21. ^ a b c Willan 1997, p. 174
  22. ^ Cumberlidge 2009, p. 184
  23. ^ Willan 1997, p. 175
  24. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 46–47
  25. ^ Owen 1983, p. 53
  26. ^ "Manchester Ship Canal Police", Magazine of the Police Memorabilia Collectors Club (149), 13 August 2010
  27. ^ Shaw, William A. (1906), The Knights of England, Sherratt and Hughes, retrieved 8 August 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  28. ^ Owen 1983, p. 3
  29. ^ Officer, Lawrence H., Five Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a UK Pound Amount, 1830 to Present, MeasuringWorth, retrieved 8 August 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  30. ^ Owen 1983, p. 120
  31. ^ a b Gray 1997, p. 6
  32. ^ Farnie 1980, p. 3
  33. ^ Owen 1983, p. 89
  34. ^ Gray 1993, p. 34
  35. ^ a b Officer, Lawrence H. (2009), Purchasing Power of British Pounds from 1264 to Present, MeasuringWorth, retrieved 3 December 2009 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  36. ^ Gray 1993, p. 38
  37. ^ Owen 1983, p. 93
  38. ^ Northwest firsts – facts and figures, Industrial Powerhouse, 2009, retrieved 5 September 2010 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  39. ^ Barton-upon-Irwell Conservation Area, Salford City Council, retrieved 2 January 2010 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  40. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 117–118
  41. ^ Gray 1997, p. 25
  42. ^ Haws 2000, p. 19
  43. ^ Stoker 1985, p. 55
  44. ^ a b Haws 2000, p. 43
  45. ^ The Monopolies and Mergers Commission 1976, p. 35
  46. ^ Gray 1993, p. 118
  47. ^ Mersey Ports Marketing: Manchester Ship Canal History, Manchester Ship Canal, retrieved 12 July 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  48. ^ Willan 1977, pp. 179–190
  49. ^ Rennison 1996, p. 264
  50. ^ a b c Gray 1997, p. 69
  51. ^ Farnie 1980, pp. 132–133
  52. ^ Gray 1997, p. 31
  53. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 80–82
  54. ^ Gray 1997, p. 56
  55. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 124
  56. ^ Gray 1997, p. 82
  57. ^ Monopolies and Mergers Commission 1976, p. 37
  58. ^ Stoker 1985, pp. 57–58
  59. ^ Woodroofe, Fletcher A. (1899), "Manchester Ship Canal: The Economic Results of the Ship Canal on Manchester and the Surrounding District", LSE Selected Pamphlets, LSE Selected Pamphlets, hosted at jstor.org: 37, JSTOR 60241154
  60. ^ Nicholls 1996, p. 22
  61. ^ a b Nicholls 1996, p. 24
  62. ^ Farnie 1980, p. 114
  63. ^ Nicholls 1996, p. 112
  64. ^ a b Parkinson-Bailey 2000, p. 128
  65. ^ Salford Quays Milestones: The Story of Salford Quays (PDF), retrieved 21 August 2009 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  66. ^ Salford Quays, Pastscape.org.uk, retrieved 28 April 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  67. ^ Explore the Museum, National Waterways Museum, retrieved 29 November 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  68. ^ Island Warehouse, National Waterways Museum, retrieved 29 November 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  69. ^ Owen 1983, pp. 122–123
  70. ^ Meet the Starts of the Show ..., Severn Valley Railway, retrieved 7 August 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  71. ^ a b Gray 1997, p. 101
  72. ^ Gray 1993, p. 57
  73. ^ Steam locomotives in Lancashire, www.steamlocomotive.info, retrieved 6 November 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  74. ^ Gray 1997, p. 108
  75. ^ Kirkwood 2004, p. 83
  76. ^ Port Statistics (XLS), Department for Transport, retrieved 29 July 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  77. ^ InCom Working Group 16 1996, p. 12
  78. ^ Vessel Requirements (PDF), Panama Canal Authority, retrieved 22 July 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  79. ^ Wood 2005, p. 157
  80. ^ Greater Manchester County Record Office (with Manchester Archives) Guide to Local Government Records (DOC), Manchester Library & Information Service, retrieved 7 August 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  81. ^ King 2006, pp. 98–100
  82. ^ King 2006, p. 100
  83. ^ Rooth, Ben (18 October 2007), "Ship canal back in action", Manchester Evening News, MEN Media, retrieved 25 April 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  84. ^ History, Peel Holdings, retrieved 25 April 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  85. ^ Peel Ports to create 3,000 jobs in ship canal revival, MEN Media, 8 June 2011, retrieved 22 July 2011 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
Bibliography
  • Albert, William (2007), The Turnpike Road System in England, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-03391-8
  • Cumberlidge, Jane (2009), Inland Waterways of Great Britain (8th ed.), Imray Laurie Norie and Wilson, ISBN 978-1-84623-010-3
  • Farnie, D. A. (1980), The Manchester Ship Canal and the rise of the Port of Manchester, Manchester University Press, ISBN 0-7190-0795-X
  • Gray, Ted (1993), A Hundred Years of the Manchester Ship Canal, Aurora Publishing, ISBN 1-85926-030-6
  • Gray, Ted (1997), Manchester Ship Canal, Sutton Publishing, ISBN 0-7509-1459-9
  • Harford, Ian (1994), Manchester and its Ship Canal Movement, Ryburn Publishing, ISBN 1-85331-075-1
  • Haws, Duncan (2000), Merchants Fleets No.38 Manchester Liners etc, Duncan Haws, ISBN 0-946378-39-8
  • InCom Working Group 16 (May 1996), Standardization of ships and inland waterways for river/sea navigation, The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |publication= ignored (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  • King, Ray (2006), Detonation: Rebirth of a City, Clear Publications, ISBN 0-9552621-0-0
  • Kirkwood, Niall (2004), Manufactured Sites: Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-0-415-24365-0
  • Nicholls, Robert (1996), Trafford Park: The First Hundred Years, Phillimore & Co, ISBN 1-86077-013-4
  • Owen, David (1983), The Manchester Ship Canal, Manchester University Press, ISBN 0-7190-0864-6
  • Parkinson-Bailey, John J. (2000), Manchester: An Architectural History, ISBN 0-7190-5606-3
  • Rennison, Robert William (1996), Civil Engineering Heritage: Northern England, Thomas Telford, ISBN 978-0-7277-251-89
  • Stoker, Robert B. (1985), The Saga of Manchester Liners, Kinglish Ltd, ISBN 0-9507480-2-1
  • The Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1976), Eurocanadian Shipholdings Limited and Furness, Withy & Company, Limited and Manchester Liners Limited: A Report on the Existing and Proposed Mergers (PDF), Competition Commission, retrieved 22 November 2008 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  • Wheeler, James (1836), Manchester: Its Political, Social and Commercial History, Ancient and Modern, Whittaker and Co.
  • Willan, Thomas Stuart; Ratcliffe, Barrie M. (1977), Trade and transport: essays in economic history in honour of T. S. Willan, Manchester University Press, ISBN 0-8476-6013-3{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Wood, Cyril (2005), Manchester's Ship Canal: The Big Ditch, Tempus Publishing Ltd, ISBN 978-0-7524-2811-6

Further reading

  • Leech, Sir Bosdin (1907), History of the Manchester Ship Canal (2 volumes), Sherratt & Hughes