Talk:Logitech MX Revolution
 | This article was nominated for deletion on March 28, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Oops, can you put that again, I messed up. I had the edit window open, and I went of to do something, and I came back and it said "edit conflict." Then I accidentally clicked on save page while I had it blank. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.175.201 (talk • contribs)
is this article still orphan? it's linked to in "mouse (computing)", "vx revolution" and "logitech" (that's all i found linking to it) HuGo_87 (talk) 04:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Dubious
How can this product be the "best mouse of 2011" in March 2010? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrDeke (talk • contribs) 16:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Discontinued (sort of)
Logitech no longer sells the MX Revolution - at least not the way it used to be sold. The only way Logitech now sells the MX Revolution is paired with a keyboard (at a, not surprisingly, significantly higher price). Needless to say, the MX Revolution-specific links on the Article page no longer work.
It appears that Logitech has replaced the MX Revolution with their Performance Mouse MX. However, the Performance is a downgrade in several ways. Reviews at Logitech's own site describe the problems. Donlibes (talk) 16:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- There may have been a wide window where there was no MX mouse in production. The Performance is better in every way, though it may have more ways to die or do so sooner. The left click thing seems to afflict all mouses / seems almost a designed obsolescence deal since the rubber ball system is no longer with us. The receiver is very tiny though, I'd be afraid to loose it carrying it around, but the usb charging cord is ok for portability. There should be a place to put the receiver in the battery cage where there is certainly enough room. The notability concern is interesting because it probably is the best mouse there is, and historically interesting mainly for the first wheel feature of its kind I think. But the quality of the article is poor, especially in the refs dept. and all of Logitech's product seem to be in question (I [literally] don't know of the others, but this one should probably stay.... seems like the name should drop the Logitech prefix though) ... a Performance Mx section would be a nice addition and maybe allow for newer/better references if anyone is up to it (Logitech employee reading this??) 67.54.235.190 (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)