Jump to content

Banality of evil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.86.27.193 (talk) at 13:55, 22 January 2012 (→‎Criticism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Banality of evil is a phrase coined by Hannah Arendt and incorporated in the title of her 1963 work Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.[1] It describes the thesis that the great evils in history generally, and the Holocaust in particular, were not executed by fanatics or sociopaths, but rather by ordinary people who accepted the premises of their state and therefore participated with the view that their actions were normal.

Explaining this phenomenon, Edward S. Herman has emphasized the importance of "normalizing the unthinkable." According to him, "doing terrible things in an organized and systematic way rests on 'normalization.' This is the process whereby ugly, degrading, murderous, and unspeakable acts become routine and are accepted as 'the way things are done.'"[2]

Criticism

Reicher and Haslam have challenged Arendt's idea of the banality of evil. They agree that ordinary people can commit evil actions, but they assert that it is not simply a matter of “blind people following orders.” They point to historical and psychological evidence that suggest that ordinary people become evil when they identify with evil ideology.[3]

They cite Cesarani's Eichmann: His Life and Crimes, as “suggesting that Arendt’s analysis was, at best, naive.” In his work, Cesarani claims Arendt only attended the beginning of Eichmann’s trial and missed the defendant’s more revealing admissions. The author recalls that Eichmann spoke proudly of the creative measures with which he executed Hitler’s policy. To Cesarani, this was indicative of an active involvement in evil, not just a passive following of orders.[3]

Reicher and Haslam have also reinterpreted the findings of a number of landmark psychological cases, including Milgram's obedience studies and Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment to conclude that people follow ideology, not just orders.[3] They have proposed a number of factors that can be used to explain how people become swayed by evil ideology. These factors include:

  • individual differences (not everyone will choose to commit evil)
  • crisis or group failures (people are most vulnerable under a crisis or when a social group they belong to falls apart)
  • leadership (people require a strong leader to encourage them to commit evil).[3]

Reicher and Haslam admit these are just some of the factors involved and that more research needs to be done. In part, they blame the popularity of Arendt’s banality of evil for handcuffing research for so long.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ Bird, David (December 6, 1975). "Hannah Arendt, Political Scientist, Dead". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-03-12. Hannah Arendt, the political philosopher who escaped Hitler's Germany and later scrutinized its morality in "Eichmann in Jerusalem" and other books, died Thursday night in her apartment at 370 Riverside Drive.
  2. ^ Edward S. Herman The Banality of Evil, 1991.
  3. ^ a b c d e "Questioning the banality of evil" Volume 21 (January 2008), The Psychologist, Retrieved on 2011-03-12