Jump to content

User talk:Rrius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.7.90.110 (talk) at 04:12, 10 February 2012 (→~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Welcome to my talk page.
  • I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page unless you tell me otherwise. You may want to Watch this page until you are responded to.
  • If I placed a comment on your page, I have added it to my watchlist, so please reply there.
  • Also, please don't forget to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
  • Finally, don't forget to assume good faith; I make a lot of mistakes.
Archive
Archives
  1. Sept. 2007 to Sept. 2008
  2. Sept. to Dec. 2008
  3. Jan. to Feb. 2009
  4. Feb. to Aug. 2009
  5. Aug. to Oct. 2009
  6. Oct. to Dec. 2009
  7. Jan. to Feb. 2010
  8. Feb. to May 2010
  9. May to Jun. 2010
  10. Jun. to Oct. 2010
  11. Oct. to Dec. 2010
  12. Jan. to May 2011
  13. May to Oct. 2011
  14. Oct. to Dec. 2011
  15. Jan. to May 2012
  16. May to Sept. 2012
  17. Sept. to Dec. 2012
  18. Jan. to Mar. 2013
  19. Mar. to Sept. 2013
  20. Sept. to Dec. 2013
  21. Jan. to Dec. 2014
  22. Jan. to Dec. 2015
  23. Jan. 2016 to Mar. 2018
  24. Mar. 2018 to Dec. 2020
  25. Dec. 2020 to present
Index

Your edit to article on J. Sumption

Hello,

I am sure your cutting of this article's explanation of how the Supreme Court replaced the Appellate Committee was well-intended -- you noted that this was not relevant as JS was not joining the Appellate Committee but the Supreme Court. However, if you continue in the article, you will see that later on there is a comparative discussion of the tiny handful of lawyers who went directly from the Bar to the Appellate Committee (as JS has to the committee's successor). For lay readers (like Yours truly), the relevance of a discussion of direct elevation to the Appellate Committee will not be obvious unless they are told that the Supreme Court is its successor.

Best wishes with your future edits. Nandt1 (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then it belongs there, not where it makes no sense. -Rrius (talk) 23:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No sense

Do you know what a Single Member Electorate is? Do you know what FPP is? Ever heard of Adolf Hitler? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.61.161 (talk) 11:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what "democratic" means? It doesn't mean liberal and fuzzy. A person elected by first past the post in a single member constituency is democratically elected because he or she was elected by the people. I presume you support proportional representation. Supporters of PR argue it is more democratic, but even if that is so, it doesn't mean FPTP isn't democratic. Your edit were inappropriate and poorly informed, so I reverted them. -Rrius (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

Sorry

I just wanted to let you know that I commented at WP:CANADA, and I see what happened and why you thoguht I was lying. Sorry again, 174.7.90.110 (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rrius&oldid=476066016"