User talk:TWIIWT

Welcome!

Hello, TWIIWT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Philistines. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site guidelines and policies you may find useful

"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). Primary sources are to be avoided to prevent original research.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Seriously, use sources and quit engaging in original research

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Philistines. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To repeat, I used and cited a verifiable source, Herodotus. I have also cited Josephus. Who declared those two unverifiable and why? More importantly, HOW? You are telling me now I can be blocked for citing verifiable sources as long as you refuse to recognize they are verifiable? TWIIWT (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]