User talk:Fortheloveofbacon/Archive 4
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fortheloveofbacon (talk | contribs) at 19:24, 21 March 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
 | This user has an alternative account named whatever you feel like, apparently. |
 |
|
♠
March 2012
Hello. I wanted to ask you about this account. It does not appear to be a doppelganger account ("a second account created with a username similar to one's main account"), since the usernames are so different. Could you explain a little more clearly why you set up this second account? TNXMan 15:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent detective work! ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 00:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Fortheloveofbacon. Could you please answer Tnxman's query? It'll allow us to understand your intentions for creating this account. Kind regards. Wifione Message 10:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are reasons to have multiple accounts, other than a Doppelgänger.ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 10:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed the tag from Doppelgänger to alternative. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 11:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Could you kindly place a tag/link to your main account on both your user and talk pages here to ensure that any visitor to your user space is clear that you use two accounts. Thanks and best. Wifione Message 12:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 18:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- N.B. I don't think that's technically required (especially for humor accounts)... and it kind of screws with the formatting, so if it disappears from my talk page, that's why. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 18:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I do understand what you're mentioning. It's actually good to edit Wikipedia with a sense of good humor. Allows editors to get through the tough moments :) Still, it's not the right form to not link your accounts clearly for other editors. Therefore, do please consider this strong request to link your accounts clearly, irrespective of whether your account is in humor or not. Other editors will view this quite positively. Thanks. Wifione Message 03:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Understood, and agreed. 03:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- I do understand what you're mentioning. It's actually good to edit Wikipedia with a sense of good humor. Allows editors to get through the tough moments :) Still, it's not the right form to not link your accounts clearly for other editors. Therefore, do please consider this strong request to link your accounts clearly, irrespective of whether your account is in humor or not. Other editors will view this quite positively. Thanks. Wifione Message 03:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Could you kindly place a tag/link to your main account on both your user and talk pages here to ensure that any visitor to your user space is clear that you use two accounts. Thanks and best. Wifione Message 12:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed the tag from Doppelgänger to alternative. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 11:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are reasons to have multiple accounts, other than a Doppelgänger.ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 10:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Fortheloveofbacon. Could you please answer Tnxman's query? It'll allow us to understand your intentions for creating this account. Kind regards. Wifione Message 10:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help
Hi-there. Thank you again for your help. I submitted the article, but want to make sure that everything is disclosed on the articles talk page to show that the article was created in adherence to wiki guidelines. Would you mind making a brief note on the articles talk page explaining that you reviewed the article. Bloomberg_Government It would be much appreciated. --RivBitz (talk) 16:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course. Done. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 19:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]