Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iaaasi
Iaaasi
- Iaaasi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– This SPI case is open.
03 April 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Dobitocilor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
There is a mass sockpuppetry coming from said user. New sockpuppet will be creating as soon as the previous one has blocked without any moral.
- I might as well suggest reinstating an IP range block.
- But, if that is not feasible for whatever reason, I might as well suggest giving a semi-protection to the frequently attacked articles such as History of Transylvania, Gelou, Voivodeship of Transylvania, Eastern Hungarian Kingdom, Szekler National Council, Gesta Hungarorum ,Glad (duke), Long War (Ottoman wars), Battle of Varna, Banat of Temeswar and Romania during World War I.
- Also, it is important to note that the talk pages of the moot articles are also needed semi-protection.
Iaaasi appears to think that WP policies do not apply to him, and his mass sockpuppetry seriously undermines the spirit of the Wikipedia project.-- Nmate (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Who is udermining the Wikipedia:Wiki spirit here?
"Focus on creation-oriented editing rather than suppression-oriented editing.
- creation-oriented editing is, for example, creating new pages, adding more information
- suppression-oriented editing is, for example, page deletion, blocking user, protecting page"
When did you last create an article, upload a picture, write a paragraph or at least correct a typo? Your request for deletion of a cooperation board is representative for your way of behaving here [1] Dobitocilor (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- You do not have anything to do with Wikipedia any more, Iaaasi, therefore; I refuse to respond to your accusation on the grounds that you do not know that if you are banned from editing, it really means that you are banned from editing. Only that you do not understand that "NO" means "NO", due to the deficiency of your personality. And yes, reporting you is fairly counterproductive, it even abhorrents to me, and still I am obliged to do so.--Nmate (talk) 12:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Obliged by whom? By your battleground mentality? How about trying to "attack" some articles yourself instead of only stalking your self-proclaimed opponents? Is is funny that you ask for the semi protection of articles against this kind of edits [2] Dobitocilor (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)