User talk:Homeostasis07

I need your help

I noticed your work fleshing out the charting positions of Golden Age of Grotesque and would like to ask for your assistance doing the same for Holy Wood, Mechanical Animals and Antichrist Superstar. I've been having a hard time searching for the EU and International ratings and your input would be greatly appreciated. I've spent a great deal of time working on the Holy Wood page and they would just help complete it all the more. Thank you in advance. -Red marquis (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm currently working on the Holy Wood charts section. I'll be updating in the next couple of days. But Antichrist Superstar and Mechanical Animals, though, they're a whole different ballgame. I'm findin' nothing. Trustworthy chart stats from the 90's are virtually impossible to come by for most European countries. But I'll see what I can do.Homeostasis07 (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

aCharts.us

This is just a heads-up letting you know that aCharts.us is not considered a reliable source, so you should look for alternate sources for citing chart positions for albums. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Common Burn

The article Common Burn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single not yet released. Not likely to be passing WP:NSONG at this time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited Travelling (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add information from the United World Chart (mediatraffic.de), or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 04:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never did. Thank you. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll provide the diff: [1]. Note that you even call out your use of mediatraffic in the edit summary.—Kww(talk) 01:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the word Mediatraffic in the edit summery there refers to a discussion on that articles' Talk page. If you read the actual edit you linked to, you'd find I did not use it as a source anywhere. I stand by my claim of never including information from United World Chart on a Wikipedia article or using such as a source. Thank you. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit includes the direct text "Other sources have claimed sales to be more likely in the region of 5.4 million copies,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mediatraffic.de/year-end-albums.htm|Album Countdown 2011|publisher=MediaTraffic|accessdate=2012-03-06}}</ref>". The way I find these edits is by checking for links to mediatraffic. I don't trawl edit summaries or talk pages, I search for links.—Kww(talk) 01:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.7.209 (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]