Talk:Galeon
Appearance
Galeon was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 3, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Galeon GTK+1
I'm a bit tired of surfing the web in search of Galeon history coverage. If anybody happens to recall a good material on GTK+1 version of the browser, please update the Galeon#On the rise section or at least link it here so I could do it. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Galeon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kaypoh (talk · contribs) 16:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Development history section does not mention most important detail. When did Galeon start? Many basic language errors. Please copyedit, expand, then renominate. --Kaypoh (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)