User talk:Calabe1992

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Editing of this talk page may be restricted to autoconfirmed users only. If you are not able to leave a message, please see my talk page for nonconfirmed users.

This is Calabe1992's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 7 days

MikeHasIssues

I noticed you initiated a SPI regarding the aforementioned username. I suspect this user is related to the following SPI. Going to add it to the SPI. Just letting you know.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hershebar/Archive

Fasttimes68 (talk) 21:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, excellent. I've opened a new investigation under that title, so we'll see what that brings. Calabe 1992 15:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please email me if you would like some background history. It might clear some things up.Fasttimes68 (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Calabe 1992 15:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a new sock is back. I noticed the last sock was indef blocked. Is that pretty much the same thing as a ban? wow Fasttimes68 (talk) 22:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A block simply does not allow an account from editing - a ban is a community consensus that allows a user's contributions to be reverted on sight - the person who is operating the accounts is prohibited from editing, and blocks will be used to enforce a ban. I will probably propose a ban based on what has taken place here. Calabe 1992 22:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Feud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traveller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD vs. db-a7

Hello-- regarding this edit, I recommend taking that from a speedy to an AfD if you believe it merits such action. A number of IP editors have contested your tag. It's on my watchlist because it's been through this cycle several times before. Might be time to get consensus. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. I see it was deleted once in October, but will go ahead and leave it for the community to decide. Oddly, the bottom IP on the talk page actually left a misformatted message basically saying it should be deleted. Not sure they understood what they were doing. Calabe 1992 14:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template: Seether

I was looking at Seether's template and I noticed the demos weren't on there. I attempted to put them on there myself, but for some reason they don't show up. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Seether&action=edit&oldid=486124382 Do you know how to put them in? And also, I was looking at [[

Template:Bullet for My Valentine|Bullet for My Valentine's template]] and I noticed the singles were organized grouped by the albums they were released from. Do you know how to put that in as well? (They contributed "I've Got You Under My Skin" under His Way, Our Way album so I don't know where that would go in the template.)

Thanks. How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Sign Contribs 21:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I made an edit to the template to make the demos appear properly (it was just formatting). I will start building a new template for Seether's singles by album. For those that would not fall under any specific album, they would fall under "other singles" or similar. See Template:Linkin Park for another example. Calabe 1992 01:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Tell me what you think. Calabe 1992 01:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helperbot

Total mistake. Didn't mean to do it, would be stupid to revert a bot that will just remove it again anyway. Didn't even realise i had done it.Edinburgh Wanderer 13:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Figured that was what happened, but wanted to make sure. (I've reverted it when it has edit conflicted and removed the wrong reports, but didn't see that as the case here.) Calabe 1992 13:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

Not sure what has happened, have previously successfully added to and edited text. Now looking to add an authority page with references on one of my specialist subjects and this has not been permitted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alert Publishing (talk • contribs)

You have a WP:COI with the subject you are editing. Your WP:Username also indicates that you are using a role account. Calabe 1992 14:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANonymous_carl

I did not attacked him. I stayed very polite, and invited him to a debate. Please, there is a difference between an attack and a polite invitation to a discussion. Of course, I must express my disagreement on his method, consisting of instantly remoove a contribution that took days to do, without talking about it on the discussion page. If this is a free encyclopedia, everyone's contribution should be handled the same way and not dismissed because a wikipedian with higher priviledge say so. Thank you very much. If i'm banned because of this message, than It will mean wikipedia is no more the free encyclopedia that it sworn to be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.204.239.254 (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You accused him of violating his privileges. First, read over WP:AGF, and then look around WP:HELP to learn more about this encyclopedia. Calabe 1992 20:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I read these rules, which I entirely approve. I am a big wikipedia fan and I have great hopes for this encyclopedia in the future. But you should read about the whole matter before sending me a warning like if I was a delinquent . He removed a whole 5 days contribution ( it took 5 days to find all the sources), that was well sourced (more than 10) and veridic. I don't think he has the rights to do that without discussing the matter in the discussion page. If he can do this without having any penalties, this means that he can subsequently do whatever he wants on this encyclopedia and undo/ban whoever he wants or whatever contribution he wants without giving the concrete proof that something his wrong. This means that he can write lies and undo true facts without being edited himself : this is not and should not be the case, I red all the wikipedia rules.