User talk:Shrike
Welcome!
Hello, Shrike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ←Humus sapiens ну? 20:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Unwarranted accusations
Shrike,
This is the third time now you posted on my page, questioning my behavior in the topic area without good reason. The last time, I specifically asked you not to post allegations to my page but to make the your accusations through the appropriate channels if you have any issues with my edits [1].
With respect to me, you clearly do not have the required objectivity (or authority) needed to stand as Judge and Jury to decide that I have violated the 1RR rules. I vehemently deny that I have done so and I demand that you withdraw your accusations in full, or make a report through the appropriate channels. Dlv999 (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. Please look at this and this, and perhaps reconsider who is making the unwarranted accusations.Ankh.Morpork 10:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Maariv interview: new source added (leading Scottish newspaper The Herald), and not sure if my cite from The Jewish Week is new too. Are they OK by you? Do add your response (if you feel the need for one) on the article talk page, this was just a heads up from me to you. ~ Iloveandrea (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Knowledge of sockmaster's ID?
Hi, Shrike. I see from your last edit to this section of Tnxman307's talk page that you thought I was out of line to call an apparent sock an apparent sock. Perhaps, but I doubt it. Maybe checkuser results will shed some light. But your post reminded me of something. The following is buried in this section of AE Archive 113:
- Comment by Who is it, really?
This case is identical to one brought against Shuki a couple of weeks ago, by none other than Zscarpia, where it was found that "using the ADL, an organization with an obvious agenda (whether one agrees with their agenda or not is irrelevant), as the sole source for that kind of claim claim is plainly tendentious. " Shuli was indef topic banned for this. Let's handle these cases with some consistency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Who is it, really? (talk • contribs) 14:37 & 14:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC) ( Account indefinitely blocked at 17:24, 10 April 2012 UTC for abusing multiple accounts. See hidden text. )
I meant to ask you about this at the time, but simply forgot: Your comment to the account going by the name, "Who is it, really?" suggests to me that you may have known who that was, really, or that you at least strongly suspected the account was a sock, and that you didn't want the account blocked for that reason. I'd like to think there's a different interpretation that I'm missing in reading your comment, but I can't think of one. Can you enlighten me on this, please? --OhioStandard (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)