Jump to content

User talk:85.81.20.149

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 85.81.20.149 (talk) at 18:00, 11 June 2012 (→‎Your recent edits). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Inahet 23:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Maya Ababadjani. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Inahet 20:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please don't remove stuff from Wikipedia. Thanks. Azrak 19:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit wikipeida, it may be advisable to create an account. It protects your IP address. See the login link in the upper right hand corner of the page? That is how you create an account. Yahel Guhan 04:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Your recent editing history at Counterjihad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
thanks for the warning regarding this, but please consider this guys edits and how he use namecalling (for example calling people "racist idiot") in his edit summaries. He is clearly really hard to deal with, and should defiantely be given a warning too, in my opinion. That said, I will leave the particular article for a while. -- John.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Your recent editing history at Dhimmitude shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.-- altetendekrabbe  17:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I DID NOT make a revert, i made an entirely new version of hte article as a compromise. However, your blind unexplained revert is what makes a revert war. Please explain yourself. -- 85.81.20.149 (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]