Jump to content

Software architect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2602:306:cd24:cf80:21c:b3ff:feb9:f5d3 (talk) at 22:37, 23 June 2012 (Added quotation marks around all instances of "architect" to reflect the professional title's metaphorical usage in the context of software development). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Software "architect" is a general term with many accepted definitions, which refers to a broad range of roles. Generally accepted terminology and certifications began appearing in connection with this role near the beginning of the 21st century.

History

With the increasing popularity of multi-tier application development, the choices of how an application can be built have also increased. Given that expansion, the risk that a software development project may inadvertently create a "new" end product that, in essence, already existed has grown markedly. A new "Software architect" role became necessary during software development[citation needed] .

The software "architect" concept began to take hold when object oriented programming (OOP) was coming into more widespread use (in the late 1990s and early years of the 21st century)[citation needed]. OOP allowed ever-larger and more complex applications to be built, which in turn required increased high-level application and system oversight.

The main responsibilities of a software "architect" include:

  • Limiting choices available during development by
  • Recognizing potential reuse in the organization or in the application by
  • Subdivide a complex application, during the design phase, into smaller, more manageable pieces[citation needed]
  • Grasp the functions of each component within the application[citation needed]
  • Understand the interactions and dependencies among components[citation needed]
  • Communicate these concepts to developers[citation needed]

In order to perform these responsibilities effectively, software "architects" often use tools or standardized model and symbol sets such as Unified Modeling Language[dubiousdiscuss] and OOP[citation needed] to represent systems or develop artifacts. UML has become an important tool for software "architects" to use in communicating the overall system design to developers and other team members, comparable to the drawings made by architects.

Duties

Despite the lack of an accepted overall definition, the role of software "architect" generally has certain common traits:

"Architect" makes high-level design choices much more often than low-level choices. In addition, the "architect" may sometimes dictate technical standards, including coding standards, tools, or platforms, so as to advance business goals rather than to place arbitrary restrictions on the choices of developers[citation needed]. Software "architects" may also be engaged in the design of the "architecture" of the hardware environment, or may focus entirely on the design methodology of the code.

Communication

"Architects" also have to communicate effectively, not only to understand the business needs, but also to advance their own "architectural" vision. They can do so verbally, in writing, and through various software "architectural" models that specialize in communicating "architecture."

The enterprise "architect" handles the interaction between the business and IT sides of an organization and is principally involved with determining the AS-IS and TO-BE states from a business and IT process perspective. Unfortunately many organizations are bundling the software "architect" duties within the role of Enterprise "Architecture." This is primarily done as an effort to "up-sell" the role of a software "architect" and/or to merge two disparate business-related disciplines to avoid overhead.

An application "architect" works with a single software application. This may be a full- or a part-time role. The application "architect" is almost always an active software developer[citation needed] .

Other similar titles in use, but without consensus on their exact meaning, include:

The table below indicates many of the differences between various kinds of software "architects":

"Architect" Type Strategic Thinking System Interactions Communication Design
Enterprise "Architect" Across Projects Highly Abstracted Across Organization Minimal, High Level
Solutions "Architect" Focused on solution Very Detailed Multiple Teams Detailed
Application "Architect" Component re-use, maintainability Centered on single Application Single Project Very Detailed

In the software industry, as the table above suggests, the various versions of "architect" do not always have the same goals.[1]

Architect metaphor

The term "software architect" came into being because of the perceived similarities between the creation of software and the creation of buildings.[2] Although a simplified construction metaphor may be flawed,[3] the term is allegedly meaningful in the sense that it describes the "design" aspect of the job.

The term "architect" is a professional title protected by law and restricted, in most of the world's jurisdictions, to those who are trained in the planning, design and supervision of the construction of buildings. In these jurisdictions, anyone who is not a licensed architect is prohibited from using this title in any way. In the State of New York, and in other U.S. states, the unauthorized use of the title "architect" is a felony and is subject to criminal proceedings.[4]

Ivory towers

When "architects" become too disconnected from the actual developers, they are often dismissively termed "architards", "architecture astronauts", or "Ivory Tower Architects"[citation needed] . "Architects" may think this term is often incorrectly used by developers who do not have the experience or knowledge to comprehend the "architecture"[citation needed].

Application or solutions "architects" work at a level of detail that demands involvement in actual coding, and will function best with a substantial background in software development. A school of thought[which?] holds that enterprise "architects" should also have a development background, so as to avoid the issues that can arise from an ivory-tower approach[citation needed] .

See also

References