Talk:T-1000

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fictional characters Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Archive 1
Archive 2

Pop culture references

I seem to keep removing the references for Celebrity Death Match and the Simpsons, primarily because they are observed similarities, and not cited ones. If we can citations from reliable, verifiable sources that note these similarities, all is good. Until then, we cannot have them. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 01:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some errors in this text...

"With Ellison's initial mission complete, it assigns him to act as tutor/mentor to the now incapacitated (and rebooted) T-888, which Weaver nicknames "John Henry". " Weaver didn't nickname John Henry, Dr. Boyd Sherman did. someone feel free to fix it. also, I'm a little unsure about the phrasing here.. "the T-888", its merely its body, not the mind, it was more than just re-booted, the brain was switched.. (the original brain of the t-888 was smashed between a shotgun and a rock by sarah connor) Divinity76 (talk) 20:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nanomorph? Says who?

While I (and I'm sure a lot of fans) would agree that the T-1000 can be seen as high concept use of the idea of a swarm of nanobots cooperating to create the illusion of a single entity, this is not implied anywhere in the movie. There is not a single a mention of nanotechnology in either of the two films, or even the subsequent third and fourth ones. I think we could do without this description unless Cameron himself has admitted to the T-1000 being a nanomorph in an interview. 65.65.211.12 (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]