Jump to content

Talk:Coacervate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.124.231.95 (talk) at 21:36, 26 June 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

How do I edit the first paragraph?

there is no such thing as "hydrophobic forces", there are only "hydrophobic interactions"

I think Darwin did not propose LUCA as it is defended today...

But I'm pretty sure that he mentioned that could be that a few organisms were the ancestors of phyletically independent phyla. Perhaps at least a CA for plants and another for animals, with both groups not sharing one. But I'm almost sure that the number suggested was even larger, like suggesting that even plants and animals were polyphiletic. --Extremophile 23:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job

I'd like to congratulate whoever put the "more plainly put" bit in the introduction. It's much more useful than than a lump of techno-babble unreadable by the average shmuck. The Last Melon 16:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articulo en español

Si alguien pudiese colocar mas informaciòn acerca de este tema en el articulo en español sería de gran ayuda. Gracias Mettallzoa (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]