Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Roach
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cydebot (talk | contribs) at 05:49, 25 April 2006 (Robot - Removing extraneous links to old VfD templates.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 18:42, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. Revolución 19:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable judging by the number of google hits (444). Let her get some peace. Thue | talk 20:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Cowell calls every third act 'the worst ever' so that's no distinction. --Doc (t) 20:56, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, bad precedent if we have articles for people who don't get past the darn admission round, for crying out loud. -Joshuapaquin 04:07, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, if William Hung has an article, why can't she? Most notable bad act of Season 4. 24.226.10.99 02:16, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Hung has been given advertising gigs, live performances, recording contracts, and a movie role for god's sake. Roach has been given nothing. Postdlf 05:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.