Talk:IAU designated constellations

Astronomy List‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Misc

Constellations are recognized not only by their patterns, but also by the bright stars in them. Is there any page that lists both the constellations and their prominent stars (or vice versa). I found individual stars and constellations lists, but not a page that has got both lists, maybe as a table. Jay 20:50, Sep 17, 2003 (UTC)

Would it be better to alphabetize Carina, Puppis, Pyxis, and Vela in the second group, and maybe make Argo italic? - Jeandré, 2004-03-31t11:11z

the constellations are named after heroines ar heroes.what people say its greek mythology.

[i hope you use my message]

Boundaries

_ _ The article says

precise boundaries for each constellation, so that every point in the sky belonged to exactly one constellation

Well, as every careful high-school geometry student knows, boundaries alone can't do that. For each pair of adjacent two constellations, you would have to know which of the two owns the boundary itself. And for many points (half, or a third of them, i guess) where 3 or more meet, you need to know which constellation owns that single point.
_ _ I'm not suggesting the article say that, just that something a little vaguer be said. (In practice, it must be the case that occasionally a nova falls close to a boundary, and two observers may describe it as being in different constellations, unless actual practice is more pragmatic and uses something like "within X micro-degrees of the boundary between J and K". I.e., it's worth discussing why anyone but pedants would want to have such a scheme as Delporte's. All i have to offer on that is original research, so i offer no edit. It's also likely that constellations are mentioned only in the abstracts of professional articles, with coordinates and their experimental errors, and of course the magnitude of the star, actually specifying how to identify it.)
--Jerzy•t 15:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

The introduction ("From the dawn of time...") is quite unnecessary. Information about what constellations are shouldn't be found on a list page, IMHO. --203.122.211.204 03:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ursa Major family??

Why? The so called families seems to have no common point. Said: Rursus (☻) 16:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is biased towards Western culture

Native American, African and Asian cultures have been stargazing for years. Why are their constellations neglected in this article? 76.104.28.221 (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]