Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hidaspal (talk | contribs) at 14:38, 9 September 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Doncsecz

Doncsecz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
Please note that a case was originally opened under Stubes99 (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doncsecz. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doncsecz.
09 September 2012

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

GyorgyFerenc continued the edit war on Battle of Raab after Doncsecz had been blocked for edit warring. I've asked for CheckUser for sleepers, though I'm not too concerned if it's declined. I think this is just a case of a strong opinioned editor not knowing when to give it a rest ([1]). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at a comparision between User:Hidaspal and I'm not convinced by the behavioural evidence, looks more like they just have similar interests. Just including here, in case anyone is thinking about the possibility. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm not accusing of sockpuppetry, just left this here so others don't need to look. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the IP I just added see, [2] and [3]. Not requesting CheckUser for the IP - this one is just behavioural. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a discussion on my talk page and on User talk:Nick-D#Sockpuppet of Doncsecz, where the user admitted to sockpuppetry. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

For the other related SPI see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DITWIN GRIM. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He also delets, with no right, messages by other editors on others' talk pages [4] 79.117.219.1 (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

79.117.219.1/DITWIN again to continue the war. And Hidaspal is not affected in this affair. 81.183.47.44 (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sockpuppet. [5] [6] Hidaspal (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments