User talk:Johnjdoyle
October 2012
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. A blog is generally not considered to be a reliable source, as the channel data does not necessarily back up your claim. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
The site has done data stories for the last 3+ years, all with data from the Wii's Nintendo Channel. The data stories at the main posts the site has done, you can check the last 3 years and see how many it has posted. The data is directly backed up on the Nintendo Channel, the images used in the posts are taken from direct feed screens of the Nintendo Channel using a video capture device. The Nintendo Channel data backs up the claim 100%, as the posts show with images.
- That does not make the site a reliable source - see my thread at Talk:Monster Hunter Tri.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Being covered by IGN, Destructoid, GoNintendo, Joystiq, Capcom, EBA, and lots of others, as well as doing interviews with Nintendo reps, industry reps, game reps, etc. I think makes it reliable, especially considering the information is 100% verifiable to anybody with a Wii.
- Links? And if these sites cover this, cite them, not an unreliable blog.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Being covered by IGN, Destructoid, GoNintendo, Joystiq, Capcom, EBA, and lots of others, as well as doing interviews with Nintendo reps, industry reps, game reps, etc. I think makes it reliable, especially considering the information is 100% verifiable to anybody with a Wii.
The blog is the original source, not the other sites. The site gets the credit source link, because it is the original source, you always go with the original source. Here are a few posts linked on other sites, but if you want to see GoNintendo's pages with every single one of these posted I can send you the "search" on that as well: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/04/30/monster-hunter-tri.aspx http://kotaku.com/5393302/surprise-people-prefer-wii-sports-resort-to-wii-fit-plus http://www.joystiq.com/2010/07/07/monster-hunter-tri-has-occupied-over-50-hours-per-player-on-average/ http://capcom-unity.com/gregaman/blog/2012/10/02/okami-reportedly-quite-substantial http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/701785/nintendo-stops-shipping-metroid-prime-trilogy.html http://www.capcom-unity.com/snow_infernus/blog/2011/04/28/a_years_worth_of_monster_hunter_tri_data http://gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&id=131018