Talk:Biometrics in schools
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Isant this an infringment of a childes human rights 91.195.183.217 (talk) 12:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
The right to privacy and free education? I believe so yes. Also, what if a child enrolls in a school who has lost their hands in an accident for example? --Connelly90[AlbaGuBràth] (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)==Misconeptions==
The misconceptions section is very one-sided and the only reference refers to a technology manufacturers white paper. I fear we need some npov sources.
The misconceptions section also states that templates cannot be reverse engineered. This is simply not true, with access to an enrolled template it has been proven many times that the minutiae can be reverse-engineered to create a fingerprint that would, at least, fool a biometric scanner (granted, the reconstructed image won't really fool a human, but biometric scanners primarily look for specific minutiae). With access to the original template generation algorithm it can be even easier to reverse engineer. Just something worth considering.