Talk:New York State Route 117/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this article within a day or two.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Overall, nice work, prose quality is fine by me. The article seems to be stable, neutral, and fairly comprehensive for a road of this extent and rank, history section is nicely done. All images have appropriate licenses. The entire article is suitably referenced, but there is a reference currently used in the article containing a dead link though. Would it be possible to repair/replace that one?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Mitch32(Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response. All clear now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Mitch32(Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)