Talk:Athelm/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Wulfhelm, this is a very good article on someone who, while notable, has little information available about him.

1. Well written?: Deals well with ambiguity, and covers the interesting aspects that make him notable clearly, despite difficulty.

2. Factually accurate?: Sources look quite good

3. Broad in coverage?: As said above, this article deals well with the conflict between notability and lack of information. It's short, but comprehensive.

4. Neutral point of view?: No issues

5. Article stability?: No issues

6. Images?: Not possible; as explained in the article, no coins exist with him, and I'm quite happy to believe that any other images are either obscure or unavailable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]