Jump to content

Talk:God's Not Dead (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.21.101.169 (talk) at 18:43, 27 March 2014 (→‎Awesome Sauce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: Christian / American Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Awesome Sauce

I think turning this tired old apologetics urban legend into a movie is made of win and I want anyone who reads this page to know it. Just for the record, I use the phrase "made of win" in the same sense that I believe Manos: The Hands of Fate is made of win. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 14:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you butthurt or something? These pages really aren't for your personal opinion and discussion. If you really want to discuss the movie, wikipedia really isn't the place, this is for discussion about the article, not the film, go to a forum someplace or something. Love ya, man 2602:306:CE6D:58A0:6068:76F2:D3A9:4A30 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me than an article about a movie based on an false anecdote that serves only as an apologetic argument article opens the door for discussion about whether mentioning that the anecdote is false and serves only as an apologetic argument is worth including in the article. In fact, the specific version of that tired old urban legend can be found here[1]. I think it's worth including in the article, as the similarities are so great, and the urban legend has been around since at least the late 60's and has warranted a treatment by a number of sources.MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 14:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Quite false. Something similar did actually occur recently where a student got suspended from a college for refusing to stamp on a piece of paper with the name of Jesus on it. Rightfully, however, the college realized their mistake and put him back on the course and apologized. [2] Suck it hard please. On another note, The Unbelievers was a flop too. So Christians - 0 and Atheists - 0 in terms of film. Both groups should stick to formal debates if you ask me. --86.21.101.169 (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Preorder tickets?

Considering that pre-order tickets were available for the film months before it released, it's likely that a significant amount of the revenue from opening weekend came from those and not from other movie-goers. Is there going to be any way to statistically tell how much money came from pre-order tickets? SilverserenC 02:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]