Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afro-Eurasian

Afro-Eurasian

Afro-Eurasian (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afro-Eurasian/Archive.

29 March 2014

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Southeastern European (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

(1) Both of them use an alternative signature: Southeastern European signs as "Nicholas" , Paleolithic Man (Afro-Eurasian's former sockpuppet) signed as "Original European". (2) They both delete any negative comments from their talk page: see Afro-Eurasian here [1], and Southeastern European here [2]. Borsoka (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I being involved in this nonsense?

(1) I use my name in my signature, what is problem with that? I will change that if it is against policy, but I see many other users that have their first name in their signature and there is no problem with that.

(2) I deleted two notifications on my talk page, this is non of your business as it is my talk page and I can remove whatever I want especially if it is unnecessary. I am trying to work out that issue with the user that sent me the notifications.

(3) Aside from the unfortunate name similarity, this investigation has no basis.

(4) I recall thanking you on an edit you made because you reverted vandalism, but I do not know you and why the reason is you are saying I am another person? Nicholas ^(Alo!) 20:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I would support a CU for this user. There is other evidence that I won't mention, but what has already been pointed out should suffice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out the basis of this investigation. If you are a administrator surely you would know what policy has been breached. I am too old to be involved in these and much time will be wasted. Nicholas ^(Alo!) 01:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This is getting dangerously close to being closed for insufficient evidence. --Rs chen 7754 01:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]