Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Voice to skull
This is an AFC for an article already deleted by AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice to skull). The author has already tried to use WP:RM to move it back to main space. The subject is covered adequately at electronic harassment, and most of the article would have to go anyway (e.g. "personal testimonies", which are as much use as the personal testimonies of "alien abductees"). Guy (Help!) 09:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This material is being used as a springboard for out of process requests by the author. It's a horrible WP:Coatrack and a WP:FRINGE travesty. It never should have been moved to mainspace in the first place.
Binksternet (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The way I look at it, there is no reason to delete anything on Wikipedia unless it's in violation of any policy or guideline on Wikipedia, or per legitimate request. Therefore unless you can prove it's necessary to delete any article or draft, the default decision should be Keep. - Synsepalum2013 (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's in violation of policy. That's why it was deleted at AfD. That's why your attempts to use out of process methods to get it back to mainspace are a problem, and that's why I've nominated it. Guy (Help!) 21:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- What policy? Please specify and discuss in detail. - Synsepalum2013 (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's in violation of policy. That's why it was deleted at AfD. That's why your attempts to use out of process methods to get it back to mainspace are a problem, and that's why I've nominated it. Guy (Help!) 21:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Why didn't I receive a notification for this on my talk page? I could have missed this but for my watchlist. Besides, may I ask what authority you have for taking this action? As far as I can tell, MfD is neither policy nor guideline of Wikipedia. - Synsepalum2013 (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)