Jump to content

Talk:SDI-12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 134.121.69.76 (talk) at 18:18, 5 May 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Frankly it's a poxy protocol that should be deprecated.... Slow, difficult to implement in modern uarts coz it uses the break sequence... BUT it's human readable... (fire up the old TRS-80 to read the data!). --PeterMarkSmith 07:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More expensive?

The standard document itself contains a section titled "Advantages" which lists, among other benefits:

  • Sensors can use low cost EEPROMs (electrically erasable programmable read only memory) for calibration coefficients and other information instead of internal trimming operations.
  • The use of a standard serial interface eliminates significant complexity in the design of data recorders.

These wouldn't have been thrown in as an afterthought. It seems wholly incorrect to assert that SDI-12 devices "tend to be more expensive" based on the unfounded assumption that "extra components and chips" result in a higher overall price.

134.121.69.76 (talk) 18:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]