User talk:2602:30A:2EA4:2B90:E5DA:8F55:D7C2:9B06
Welcome to the jungle. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Unfortunately I think your work on the Denise Donnelly article is going to be deleted. 2602:30A:2EA4:2B90:E5DA:8F55:D7C2:9B06 (talk) 05:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that there was a NYT piece discussing her work. The mention of that piece in the deletion discussion (I added it as a source to the article as well) along with other coverage and citations of her work is probably enough for the article to be retained, but you never know! It's not pleasant getting accused of all sorts of malfeasance trying to work through these things in a reasonable fashion, but such are the ways of the Wiki. Your comments in the other dicussion very much made me laugh. There are many essays and commentaries of the craziness that goes on here. I was impressed that you took the time to read and try to understand how things operate. Good luck with that. Only kidding. You've done a fine job so far. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. If you create a named account you will be treated with slightly less suspicion. DO NOT under any circumstances use your real name of course. Happy trails! Candleabracadabra (talk) 06:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- You're a kind person. :) 2602:30A:2EA4:2B90:E5DA:8F55:D7C2:9B06 (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that there was a NYT piece discussing her work. The mention of that piece in the deletion discussion (I added it as a source to the article as well) along with other coverage and citations of her work is probably enough for the article to be retained, but you never know! It's not pleasant getting accused of all sorts of malfeasance trying to work through these things in a reasonable fashion, but such are the ways of the Wiki. Your comments in the other dicussion very much made me laugh. There are many essays and commentaries of the craziness that goes on here. I was impressed that you took the time to read and try to understand how things operate. Good luck with that. Only kidding. You've done a fine job so far. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. If you create a named account you will be treated with slightly less suspicion. DO NOT under any circumstances use your real name of course. Happy trails! Candleabracadabra (talk) 06:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Rats, my IP address changed. *sigh* I guess it's time to create an account. 2602:30A:2EA4:2B90:4DF9:1B68:4E19:9CBB (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- An account does make it a bit easier to communicate and do editing work. And I think other editors prefer to deal with a name than an IP address. Not sure if psychological studies have been carried out on the subject? :) Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- I remembered that I do have an account that I created back in 2009, but I'm not sure I want to link it to this discussion. ;( 2602:30A:2EA4:2B90:C093:E410:45B7:B315 (talk)
IP addresses so far:
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |