User talk:DarkLight748

List of hd channels on sky+ hd

Hi there,

Please can you stop undoign the redirect to list of hd channels in the uk, firstly it against wikipedia policy to have dublicate articles. all information in this page is available in List of channels on Sky Digital and List of HD channels in the UK also the page is just advertising sky hd which is agains twikipedia polcies. if there anything that on that page that revelent add it to the otehr pages. If you presist on revertign the redirect and goign against consesus and wikipedia policy i will have to warn you and if oyu presist after that eventally i will have to report you to a admin i rather not do this please try resolve this in the above talk pages.--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 11:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thought you might be interested in a discussion that's currently taking place over on Talk:List of HD channels in the UK which is proposing the deletion/merging of the List of HD channels on Sky+ HD article. There's a difference of opinion, as you'd expect - and it would be good to have your thoughts too! Bonusballs (talk) 10:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to DarkLight748

Thanks for the updates to "List of first-person shooters". Wouldn't it be nice if the "Release Date" column in the list could automatically draw its values from the "Release date(s)" fields of each game's full Wiki article (like Microsoft Office products can do)? :-) ProResearcher (talk) 09:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rikochet (video game)

The article Rikochet (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Having looked at multiple places, I cannot find anything at all about this game. Notability is not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --MuZemike 22:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rikochet (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rikochet (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rikochet (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Odie5533 (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daylight (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daylight (video game), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 01:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]