Jump to content

Talk:Dalton (unit)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.139.255.245 (talk) at 19:16, 7 July 2006 (How come only biological sciences use the Dalton unit?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Why did they choose the AMU convention of 1/12 of C12 rather than the origional standard with 1/16 016?

Probably in large part because that was only the convention of chemists, not physicists who used 1/16 of the naturally occuring mixture of oxygen (or maybe it was vice versa). That's where the first word in the officially recognized name of this unit comes from: unified atomic mass unit, with the symbol u, is the only way this is recognized as "acceptable for use with SI". Gene Nygaard 21:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How come only biological sciences use the Dalton unit? In chemistry there is rarely a unit. The header in a table of molecular weights would be labelled 'mw' or 'molecular weight' with no unit. Just a guess, but it may be because, when talking about large molecular weights, 'kilo (no unit)' sounds kind of stupid.


How do you change Atonic mass into pounds?

via Kilograms.

I removed the following paragraph; I think it's overly simplistic and illustrates a principle of college algebra rather than of atomic masses. It is certainly not relevant to the amu unit. It also uses the term "relative atomic mass" in a strange way and. AxelBoldt 16:44, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Using Mass Spectrum Data to Calculate Relative Atomic Mass

A simple calculation may be used to calculate the relative atomic mass of the sample. This is demonstrated in the following example.

Ion Relative Mass Percentage Abundance
11C+ 11 70%
13C+ 13 30%

Therefore, the relative atomic mass of the Carbon sample is:

(70/100 x 11) + (30/100 x 13) = 7.7 + 3.9 = 11.6

[this is not the true atomic mass of carbon, it is merely illustrative]

amu to kg

the number on the page for u didn't agree exactly with the CODATA value referenced at the bottom. CODATA is state of the art, I have changed it to the CODATA value.