User talk:Allen2

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Allen2}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This page was last edited by Callofduty4 (talk) at 22:28:20, Thursday, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Archived

I did archived my talk page over a month ago for August month (except for July), but I will next archive them will be at October. --Allen ^talk 16:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allowing/prohibiting signature templates on Wikipedia

I don't think my signature page is going to be vandalized if I signed it with a signature template on talk pages, or maybe just four tildes is better. Signature templates are not vandalism targets, so maybe if it was the same going with the signature policy on Wikia allowing it on Wikipedia? Where, it goes against WP:SIG#NT?! --Allen ^talk 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be allowed signature templates on Wikipedia that way, or it goes against WP:SIG#NT using only four tildes instead of signing with a template in? I think four tildes is good, or else someone were to vandalize my signature page! --Allen ^talk 22:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucas Thoms and Redrose64: Am I right with this one: signatures must be signed with four tildes only according to the signature policy? --Allen ^talk 23:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, correct.

~~~~

is the only way to sign, and your signature can't be a transclusion (and it probably shouldn't be a substitution).—LucasThoms 00:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I mentioned the signatures can be signed only using four tildes (instead of signing their transcluded signature template, but substituted actually), then the signature is good on talk pages! ~~However transcluded signature templates are not vandalism targets that another user who trying to vandalize my signature page!~~ --Allen ^talk 00:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if anyone's trying to vandalize it or not, you can't transclude your signature.—LucasThoms 00:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All users' signatures are substituted only on talk pages, so no signatures template transclusions allowed. --Allen ^talk 00:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Via signing with four tildes on talk pages is good on Wikipedia, so their signature page is a secret place where they sign it with a substitution not a transclusion. :) --Allen ^talk 21:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clear revision log

It's a problem that I want all my revision log from my talk page cleared or deleted permanently, because of some users who was attacking me! And also know that WP:OVERSIGHT or WP:REVDEL pages to get revision logs all infinitely removed from my talk page for serious vandalism and personal attacks!

--Allen ^talk 00:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucas Thoms: Get an admin on Wikipedia as my request to get all my history log on my talk page infinitely/permanently removed, because I didn't need it stayed there or they know me my grammar was poor! --Allen ^talk 13:49, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allen, I don't know what you think I can do that you can't. If you're offended by the mild personal attacks in your page history, don't look at your page history. Revdel (RD2, at least) and oversight are for things that are so blatantly offensive that leaving them on Wikipedia would be a terrible idea. RD2 specifically says it's not [for] "ordinary" incivility, personal attacks or conduct accusations. Also, I removed the revdel template, because it says very clearly in multiple places that it's only for copyright violations.—LucasThoms 00:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A good faith idea is clearing history logs, so I'm fine/okay with it! RD2, saying that I want to hold personal attacks off my talk page by me, or another user who has admin, reviewer and rollback rights on Wikipedia! --Allen ^talk 01:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing this website, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see WP:NOT for further details). Thank you. Dromioofephesus (talk) 23:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for leaving a message on my talk page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia website only. --Allen ^talk 00:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Announcement: Tuesday, September 16^th, 2014 21:40 CST

Hi, it's Allen regarding a night update on Wikipedia. I'd really don't want to sleep late because at 9:30 PM (21:30) at Central Time I would be retiring to sleep at this time! I see that Wikia was terrifying for me to chit chat there because I don't think they know me on Wikipedia editing here as a good editor for me, I feel more comfortable and perfect here on this encyclopedia and thinking of I'm a rollbacker here to make necessary undo revisions and reverts! --Allen ^talk 02:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allen, this is exactly what Dromio was talking about. Wikipedia is about making an encyclopedia and, to be honest, no one cares when you edit. You edit when you do, and you don't when you don't, but your talk page (or anywhere else) is not the place to announce that. It very much reads like a blog, which is explicitly not allowed here. Please stop. —LucasThoms 02:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucas Thoms: I think Wikipedia is an encyclopedia only and honest, I will have to stop my announcements on my talk page according to WP:NOTBLOG, or maybe I have to remove them. --Allen ^talk 23:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I did remove them from this page, as of this policy, it's restricted on Wikipedia for users doing blogs and their current announcements. --Allen ^talk 23:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request bot account: TwilightBot

I requested my new bot account on Wikipedia for TwilightBot and need to run that for administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser rights. As identified that my bot account on Wikipedia to make an encyclopedia better. On talk pages, it would be the same thing as BracketBot's.

--Allen ^talk 18:43, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I get an admin to approve my bot account, as it was used with BracketBot's job and also the available rights are admin, bureaucrat and checkuser rights as making the encyclopedia very clean and reverse vandalism. Also I called this is Twilight Sparkle's bot (character from MLP:FiM) and alicornic/celestial. --Allen ^talk 20:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Host

Allen, I do not think you'd make an appropriate teahouse host, not only because of your poor comprehension of the English language as the use of translators translates poorly, but also because you have a very poor grasp of the rules here. Just last week you had to receive multiple warnings for using your talk page as a blog, which is evidently not allowed. As a general wikipedian, rules should be followed, which you apparently don't follow as much as expected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.234.158.221 (talk) 20:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allen, I'm Jethro, a Teahouse host. Reading over your archives and your interactions with others, I am inclined to agree with some of the concerns expressed above. For Teahouse hosting, I completely understand that you want to help other editors, and that's great. But the concern is that a lot of your behavior suggests you're still learning the fundamentals about Wikipedia policies and editing guidelines. I don't think this is the right time for you to be a host. It's also been noted that you've continued to use this page as a blog despite multiple warnings to the contrary. I see you've acknowledged that this is a problem and that you will stop, which I appreciate. Your English writing seems a little off as well. It's not bad, but it can be confusing sometimes to readers. You're absolutely welcome to use the Q&A page at the Teahouse and make a guest profile-- I think a lot of your questions here would be great to ask there. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 20:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@I JethroBT: Thanks, but I agree that why that you removed me from teahouse host? As my English, I used it as a native language and on my own words! Just reminder that my talk page is not a blog, and can be simple not to use announcements right here. I'm still helping out on Wikipedia, even with rollbackers, admins and bureaucrats does! --Allen ^talk 21:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That response is poor to say you're a native speaker of English. WP:CIR. 94.10.178.189 (talk) 21:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@94.10.178.189: No, I'm native speaker of English: used it on my own words and it's not poor at all! --Allen ^talk 21:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I can't prove it, but I am guessing that both of those IPs are the same person as it doesn't make sense for some IP to suddenly edit a user talk page now for its first edit as has occurred with the latter IP. Dustin (talk) 22:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dustin V. S.: I know, with these two IPs are one people talking to me my grammar was poor, but I'm native speaker of English of my own words! So I don't know what these IP talking about in this section, can you clarify your answer? --Allen ^talk 22:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a native speaker of English. No native speaker would speak the way you do. And you removing my message just shows that you're guilty of everything I posted on. Countless people have told you what you're doing wrong, but you've ignored everyone and have even attacked other users, trying to make yourself seem perfect. News flash: No one is perfect.

@Dustin - I'm not the same person as the other IP, but if they're who I think they are, I know them and share their concerns about Allen. Please, take what I said to heart and do something about it. Like I said, Allen is clueless and doesn't know when to quit. It's harsh, but it's true; it's not a personal attack. 208.38.239.120 (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@208.38.239.120: No, I'm good/perfect native speaking of English and used it on my own words! As I said: stop telling me about this, please. Thank you, --Allen ^talk 21:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Important statement

Hi, this is Allen for important statement on Wikipedia! I know I was compromised on Wikia, but leaving Wikia forever and start actively edit on Wikipedia (the encyclopedia). I bet DefconBot will be able to set the vandalism level on my talk page, and I like to keep it at level 5 here for low anonymous IPs personal attacks. Also reply to this important statement section if you have any questions about my talk page, okay? Thanks, --Allen ^talk 21:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanking" my edits

Please do not thank any more of my edits. I wish to have no communication with you. Zero. None. If you communicate with me in any way, I will report you for harassment, as I will judge any sort of communication from you as harassment because you have been told many times to leave me and other Wikia admins alone.

To any WP admins who read this: AllenHAcNguyen (known as Lt. Allen on Wikia) is globally banned from Wikia for persistent harassment and flaunting of Wikia's terms of use. Please treat any attempt by him to message or communicate with anyone from Wikia as harassment and I ask of you to deal with such behaviour as harassment. Thank you and have a great day. --callofduty4 (talk) 18:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cod4, alright, I'll stop doing that to thank your edits on WP. Because you did left me a message on Wikipedia, I'm leaving Wikia forever, but I edit/work alone on Wikipedia making the encyclopedia very clean.

Please, try to treat me good on Wikipedia then I will finally leave you alone and stop attempting to harass you and other Wikia admins anymore, and I will be fine on Wikipedia. --Allen ^talk 22:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we treat you "good" (nicely, I believe you mean?) on Wikipedia? You shouldn't have to threaten CoD4 to be nice to you just for that. I repeat: you should not be bargaining with CoD4 or anyone just so they'll leave you alone. As harsh as it is to say it, you're being a pain once again, and it shows. I'm sorry, but I personally believe that Wikipedia is just as bad a place for you to be as Wikia was. Also, don't go removing my message to try to hide the obvious, Allen; the past has a way of coming back to bite you in the rear, especially since you still haven't changed.

I'm giving up on trying to tell you that your English isn't proper and correct. You'll just have to suffer the consequences of people not understanding what you say. 208.38.239.120 (talk) 01:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@208.38.239.120: Alright, I give up! As you remembered me that what I said before: my first language is I'm native speaker of English and I used it on my own words! Now I need to edit and work alone on Wikipedia at my own pace, and you don't have to tell what my grammar is! Try to leave me alone at this point, then I'm fine and not attempt to be harsh at Cod4 at all. It's Tupka, he did reminded me that despite the harshness I forgive him. --Allen ^talk 01:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I give up already! Also please mind that I don't attempt to harass Cod4 and other users on Wikia, then I'll be okay/fine on Wikipedia: and I edit/work alone on Wikipedia at my own pace! I have low issues on Wikipedia! --Allen ^talk 03:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]