Talk:Nakam

Correct title

The organization in question was not called "Nakam", but "DIN" (Hebrew for "law" or "justice"). "DIN" stands for "Dam Yehudi Nakam" Ralph Goldenmouth (talk)

Unreferenced tag

The sole source for this article's serious allegations is not listed a reference but only as literature. There is only library reported on Worldcat to have a copy, and that is in Berlin at the state library. For this reason, I would consider it difficult or impossible to verify, particularly without a page by page citation to the source.Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

extremism of nakam

To what an extent can it actually be called an extremist organization. In my view the label forbids itself in an encyclopedia without beeing assigned to a relevant point of view. I'll remove it--user:goiken 00:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 0g1o2i3k4e5n6 (talk • contribs) [reply]

Thanks for publishing this page. It's months I'm asking wikipedia.it to do the same and I always receive the same replay: the tell me that I'm antisemite because I want to add a paragraph about Nakam and their poisoning plan in the page about the Jews brigade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.236.224.132 (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about this? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/jewish-brigade-shot-nazi-prisoners-in-revenge-1191139.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.236.224.132 (talk • contribs)

I don't see anything antisemitic about that, but question its relevancy. The Jewish Brigade consisted of hundreds of members and the the group planning the revenge poison attack was a few, as far as I can see. While some members of the Jewish Brigade were involved in revenge attacks after the war, it is unclear if any of them were involved in the poison plot. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finally I find somebody clever enough to understand my point of view! Unfortunately in wikipedia.it (Italy) I had not found anybody like you. I told them: look at the page that has been published on wikipedia.org! They said: that page (refereeing to this one) is ridiculous. They don't want to have any kind of discussion about it. I brought to them a lot of articles and books talking about this topic and they said that is not enough. They said that this is just a "urban legend". (If there are mistakes in my writing I apologized. I'm Italian and English is not my mother tongue)

(http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/26/second.world.war) (http://israelstreams.com/?israelinsider.html?http://israelinsider.com/Articles1/Politics/7344.htm) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.244.162.101 (talk) 06:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I rather think that any assassination squad has to be called extremist.101.98.209.132 (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

It appears that "Nokmim" is the more prevalent word used in English language sources to describe the article. Anyone supporting or opposing this move please speak up below. Thanks. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a militia

Nakam was founded by members of a militia, amongst other recruits. But it was not "a Jewish partisan militia". It was an assassination squad. There is a difference.101.98.209.132 (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statute of limitations

Why does the German statute of limitations prevent the investigation in 2000 against two Nakam activists, but not the investigation into earlier Nazi war crimes?101.98.209.132 (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]