User talk:OneGuy

User talk:OneGuy/Archive 1,
User talk:OneGuy/Archive 2
User:OneGuy/Jews historical comparison (not an archive .. just a reference so I remember this has to be deleted)
User talk:OneGuy/Archive 3

Tiger vs lion

Note you have been repeating points that have been discussed and resolved before. Animal face off is not a documentary and content and opinions in the show cannot be cited as references here, especially compared to the high standards of other sources and documentaries. All the so called reasons you used in the edit history have been discussed and resolved. You can only put that tag if you have new and valid points to support your claim, otherwise your edit is just based purely on your opinions and will be considered disruptive. Thanks. Big Cats - talk 20:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to pick and choose only opinions that agree with your views. That's why the article is biased and one sided OneGuy (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly don't get to remove non-disputed content solely because you think some "other side" isn't also included. Blowing up the encyclopedia doesn't fix perceived neutrality problems in a way that makes the reader any better off. DMacks (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is quoting Big Cat Rescue expert opinion but discovery channel isn't? OneGuy (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]