Jump to content

User talk:OneGuy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OneGuy (talk | contribs) at 22:03, 15 November 2014 (→‎Nov 2014). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Tiger vs lion

Note you have been repeating points that have been discussed and resolved before. Animal face off is not a documentary and content and opinions in the show cannot be cited as references here, especially compared to the high standards of other sources and documentaries. All the so called reasons you used in the edit history have been discussed and resolved. You can only put that tag if you have new and valid points to support your claim, otherwise your edit is just based purely on your opinions and will be considered disruptive. Thanks. Big Cats - talk 20:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to pick and choose only opinions that agree with your views. That's why the article is biased and one sided OneGuy (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You certainly don't get to remove non-disputed content solely because you think some "other side" isn't also included. Blowing up the encyclopedia doesn't fix perceived neutrality problems in a way that makes the reader any better off. DMacks (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How is quoting Big Cat Rescue expert opinion but discovery channel isn't? OneGuy (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to have a discussion on the article talk-page about the validity of various sources and get some consensus to include ones you feel are improperly omitted. Before you do, be sure to read the previous discussions there so you can be sure you are raising new points rather than merely rehashing reasonably-settled or tired-old arguments (I'm not making a statement about your ideas one way or the other). DMacks (talk) 21:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I read the discussions. That's exactly the reason why I think the article is one-sided, biased, and hogged by fanboy idiots. You can't remove references that you don't like then quote "Big Cat Rescue" and National Geographic as expert opinion. OneGuy (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nov 2014

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Big Cats - talk 22:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting references that disagree with your POV. Wikipedia is not a place to promotote your agenda NPOV OneGuy (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]