Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were useful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... More interactive tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it helpful --Anavimadumim15 (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sohn.philip (talk) 00:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was easy to follow and the sections were clear, concise and not too long!
- What I didn't like
The tutorial videos and interactive features were not compatible with my tablet. Maybe work on that in the future?
- What was missing
How to stop an indent (i.e. I only want to indent the first sentence and leave the rest of the text normal)
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
On my PC, they were really useful!
--BChung2 (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--PeteLambert (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- The videos were very helpful. I followed the videos pausing along the way to edit my sandbox page
--Rahman437 (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos teaching people how to edit an article.
- What I didn't like
More editing skills should be taught at the beginning, e.g. how to insert a picture.
- What was missing
How the editing icons work.
- What was unnecessary
None
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Did not try.
--Daamoy (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
It didn't take too long.
- What I didn't like
It was pretty un-stimulating.
- What was missing
Visual content.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Evaregehr (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very detailed training module with good links to videos and tutorials that give a better explanation or allow the user to practice. I like the idea of 5 pillars because it is easy to remember and helps users to better understand what wikipedia is about and what it is not about and how to operate within wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
The videos didn't play until I opened them in youtube, the tutorial was a little frustrating if you accidentally closed it.
- What was missing
I think a better introduction to the coding structure that is used in writing wikipedia articles would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was easy to accidentally close the tutorial and I couldn't figure out how to make it re-launch without going back through the training and then starting the tutorial over. I liked that you could keep trying again until you got it right.