Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesbian until graduation

Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 00:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot believe this has been here 2 years.--Crossmr 01:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Though I hate to do so, having read about this in the NY Times, I can attest that it's a real concept, or so the NYT feels, and the article does cite newspapers. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no doubt the concept is real or that the article cites newspapers. However, neither of those is sufficient reason for Wikipedia to keep an article that is, in the end, just a non-notable neologism. Stanfordandson 02:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the NYT times ciatation is enough for somekind of notability in this case. Yanksox 02:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability, maybe, but is there any reason to think this phenomenon actually exists? Moreover, if it does, is there any reason to think it isn't just another neologism, quite possibly a protogism? There's no reason to keep this article. Stanfordandson 03:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]