Jump to content

Talk:Gate (Mega Man)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Randall Brackett (talk | contribs) at 00:27, 21 July 2006 (→‎Merge: - nd I disagree. I think an article specifying on character involvement is suitible. I noted this on my talkpage.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Merge

This article is only too long because it has been allowed to grow out of control. It's nothing other than plot summary of Mega Man X6, and if it's too long, then it needs to be written in summary (instead of abridgement) style. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please. This is plot summary. Don't blame me if Keiji gives characters good background. Perhaps in Shin Mega Man DS he'll learn. Until then....-Randall Brackett 00:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, it looks like a book report on MMX6. Is there anything you can say about Gate that isn't somehow summarizing, describing, or analyzing MMX6? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is comparable to book reports on wikipedia, in my opinion. I also don't understand your question. Please elaborate. -Randall Brackett 00:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you can say about this character is talking about MMX6. We don't need to articles summarizing the plot of MMX6. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I disagree. I think an article specifying on character involvement is suitible. I noted this on my talkpage. Arrive at a concensus and then this will be a suitible argument. -Randall Brackett 00:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personality

This is hard core original research. It's one person's interpretation of the work, and any attempt to source it to the games would necessarily be selective quoting to push the POV that Gate's personality is such-and-such.

Wikipedia is not here to interpret fictional works for the reader. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it needs some weasel words removed, which is why I'm not reverting yet. -Randall Brackett 00:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Any version of a "personality" section that is sourced only to the games or to MM fanpages is going to be pure original research. It's going to be selective quoting to suit one person's interpretation of a fictional work. Doubly so in the case of a such a non-notable character. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]