Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99
Kirglach
- Kirglach (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
03 March 2015
– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Konglich (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
It is quite obvious that Kirglach = Konglich (similar names, similar editing style, successive edits on a not very often edited article). The article was previously protected against sockpuppetry: [1], so it is very possible that both of them are socks of User:Iaaasi or User:Stubes99 (2 sockmasters I found in the edit history) 178.41.230.175 (talk) 10:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Extra proof that Konglich = Konglich: both referred to personal union in their edits: [2] and [3] 84.16.39.44 (talk) 19:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Answer for Vanjagenije (talk) :
- do you opine that only by chance the editor names are very much alike?
-- Kirglach
-- Konglich
--(K**gl*ch)
- don't you find suspect that that Kirglach made the last edit on 21:31, 1 March 2015, while Konglich made his first edit on 12:02, 2 March 2015? (changing accounts to lose his track)
- don't you find weird that both added images to the section 'Status of Kingdom of Hungary before the revolution': https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848&diff=649526931&oldid=649526812 / https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848&diff=648969933&oldid=648968157
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Additional information needed - @178.41.230.175 and 84.16.39.44: IT is not obvious. Can you provide some stronger evidence than mentioning same two words in a discussion? Vanjagenije (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)